The cost of commercial products. Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period. Cost of commercial products In the reporting year, the cost of commercial products

22.05.2020

Topic9 « Costsproduction and production cost"

Task 1.

The sewing shop has 25 sewing machines. The power of each is 3.2 kW. The power utilization factor for 15 sewing machines is 0.92, for 10 machines it is 0.87. The price of 1 kWh of electricity is 2.4 rubles. Equipment downtime for repairs - 7%. Sewing machines work in 1 shift lasting 8 hours. The number of working days in a year is 250. Determine the amount annual costs under the article "electricity for technological purposes".

Solution

1. Total power of all machines:

(15 0,92 + 10 0,87) 3.2 = 72 kW

Electricity cost:

72 kW 2.4 rubles/kW (1-0.07) = 160.7 rubles.

3. The amount of annual electricity costs will be:

160,7 8 1 250 \u003d 321400 rubles.

Task 2

In the reporting year, the cost of marketable products amounted to 450.2 thousand rubles, the cost per ruble of marketable products amounted to 0.89 rubles. In the planned year, the cost of 1 ruble of marketable products is set at 0.85 rubles. The volume of production will increase by 8%. Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period.

Solution

1. The volume of marketable products in the reporting period:

rub.

2. The volume of marketable products in the planned period:

3. The cost of commercial products in the planned period:

Task 3.

The cost of commercial products of the enterprise in the base period amounted to 380.5 thousand rubles. In the reporting period, it is planned to increase labor productivity by 6% and average wages by 4%. The volume of production will increase by 8%. As a result of measures to reduce costs, fixed costs in the planning period will remain unchanged. The share of wages in the cost of production - 23%, fixed costs - 20%. Determine the percentage of cost reduction of commercial products and cost savings at the enterprise.

Solution

1. Cost reduction as a result of labor productivity growth and increase wages in percents:

2. Cost reduction as a result of an increase in production volume with a constant value of fixed costs:

3. Reducing the cost of commercial products due to both factors:

4. Savings from reducing the cost of production:

rub.

Task 4

According to the reporting data, savings in material costs have been established. The consumption rates of materials as a result of compliance with the economy mode are reduced by 8%. As a result of inflation, prices rose by 3%. The cost of marketable products according to the report amounted to 120.6 thousand rubles, the cost of raw materials and materials - 80.8 thousand rubles. Determine the reduction in the cost of commercial products as a result of the influence of these factors.

Solution

1. The share of material costs in the cost of production:

2. Change in the cost of commercial products:

Task 5

The company signed a long-term contract for the annual supply of 1.5 million items. Contractual obligations can be secured in one of two ways.

1. Acquisition of equipment with a capacity of 2 million items per year.

2. Acquisition of two units of equipment with a capacity of 0.8 million items per year.

The cost of production of one product for each option at 100% equipment load is shown in the table.

Determine the best of the options according to the criterion of production cost.

Solution

Indicators	Options
Indicators
1.Usage production capacity
2. Conditionally variable costs, rub./t.
3. Fixed costs, rub./t.
4.Total cost

The best cost is the second option.

Tasks for independent solution.

Task 6.

Determine the planned and actual level of costs per ruble of marketable products, as well as its change as a percentage of the reporting period, if the enterprise produces 17 thousand products per year at a cost of 540 rubles per unit. The plan for the coming period provides for an increase in output by 10% and a reduction in production costs as a result of the introduction of resource-saving technologies by 5%. The price of the product is 600 rubles / unit.

Task 7.

The enterprise produces products "A" - 7000 units, "B" - 4500 units, "C" - 2500 units. The amount of general production expenses according to the estimate is 90960 million rubles. General business expenses according to the standard amount to 140% of the wages of production workers. Wages for one product will be, respectively, by type of product: - 4300 rubles, 4000 rubles, 3500 rubles. Determine the general production and general business expenses for one product and the total amount of general business expenses.

Task 8.

The cost of commercial products of the enterprise in the base period amounted to 496 thousand rubles. In the reporting period, it is planned to increase labor productivity by 8% and average wages by 3%. The volume of production as a result of increased demand will increase by 15%. As a result of measures to reduce costs, fixed costs in the planning period will remain unchanged. The share of wages in the cost of production - 28%, fixed costs - 45%. Determine the percentage of cost reduction of commercial products and cost savings at the enterprise.

Task 9.

In the reporting year, the cost of marketable products amounted to 4978 thousand rubles, the cost per ruble of marketable products amounted to 0.85 rubles. In the planned year, the cost of 1 ruble of marketable products is set at 0.92 rubles. The volume of production will increase by 12%. Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period.

Task 10.

As a result of the introduction of resource-saving technology, it is planned to reduce the consumption rate of materials by 5%, while at the same time increasing prices for materials as a result of inflation by 3%. The cost of commercial products is 300 thousand rubles, including the cost of raw materials in the cost of 58%.

The plan for the cost of production is one of the most important sections of the plan for the economic and social development of the enterprise. Planning the cost of production at an enterprise is very important, as it allows you to know what costs the enterprise will need to produce and sell products, what financial results can be expected in the planning period. The production cost plan includes the following sections:

1. Estimate of costs for the production of products (compiled according to economic elements).

2. The cost of all marketable and sold products.

3. Planned cost estimates for individual products.

4. Calculation of cost reduction of marketable products according to technical and economic factors.

The most important quality indicators of the plan for the cost of production are:

the cost of commercial and sold products;

unit cost of the most important types of products;

costs for 1 rub. commercial products;

percentage of cost reduction by technical and economic factors;

percent reduction in the cost of compared products.

Production Cost Estimate is compiled without intra-factory turnover based on the calculation for each element and is the main document for the development financial plan. It is compiled for the year with the distribution of the entire amount of expenses by quarters.

The costs of raw materials, basic and auxiliary materials, fuel and energy in the cost estimate are determined primarily for the production program based on the planned volume, norms and prices.

The total amount of depreciation deductions is calculated on the basis of the current norms for groups of fixed assets. Based on the cost estimate, the costs for the entire gross and commodity output are determined. Production costs gross output are determined from the expression

VP \u003d Sp - Zn.v

where Sp - production costs according to the estimate;

Zn.v - costs not included in the gross output.

Production costs marketable products determined by the formula

TP \u003d VP ± (n + n),

where n is the change in the remains of semi-finished products of their manufacture;

n - change in work in progress;

± - the increase in terms is subtracted, the reduction is added.

Cost of goods sold represents the full cost of marketable products minus the increase plus the decrease in the cost of the balance of unsold products in the planned period.

Calculation unit cost is called calculation. Calculations are estimated, planned, normative.

Estimated costing is compiled for products or orders that are performed on a one-time basis.

Standard cost estimate(annual, quarterly, monthly) is compiled for the mastered products provided for by the production program.

Normative costing reflects the level of the cost of production, calculated according to the cost norms in force at the time of its compilation. It is compiled in those industries where there is a normative accounting for production costs.

Methods of planning the cost of production. In practice, the most widespread are two methods of planning the cost of production: normative and planning based on technical and economic factors. As a rule, they are used in close relationship.

The essence of the normative method lies in the fact that when planning the cost of production, the norms and standards for the use of material, labor and financial resources, i.e. regulatory framework of the enterprise.

The method of planning the cost of production by technical and economic factors is more preferable than the standard method, since it allows you to take into account many factors that will most significantly affect the cost of production in the planning period. This method takes into account the following factors:

1) technical, i.e. implementation at the enterprise in the planned period new technology and technology;

2) organizational. These factors are understood as the improvement of the organization of production and labor at the enterprise in the planned period (deepening of specialization and cooperation, improvement of the organizational structure of enterprise management, introduction of a brigade form of labor organization, NOT, etc.);

3) change in the volume, range and range of products;

4) the level of inflation in the planning period;

5) specific factors that depend on the characteristics of production. For example, for mining enterprises - a change in the mining and geological conditions for the development of minerals; for sugar factories - change in the sugar content of sugar beets.

All these factors ultimately affect the volume of output, labor productivity (production), changes in norms and prices for material resources.

To determine the amount of change in the cost of production in the planned period due to the influence of the above factors, the following formulas can be used:

a) change in the value of the cost of production from changes in labor productivity (D Spt):

where J zp - index of average wages;

J Fri - index of labor productivity (production);

J zp - the share of wages with deductions for social needs in the cost of production;

b) change in the value of the cost of production from a change in the volume of production (D С V):

where J yn - index of conditionally fixed costs;

J V - production volume index;

Jy p - the share of semi-fixed costs in the cost of production;

c) change in the value of the cost of production from changes in the norms and prices for material resources (D Sn.ts):

where J n - index of norms for material resources;

J - price index for material resources;

J m - the share of material resources in the cost of production.

The total value of the change in the cost of production in the planned period will be (D C total):

We will show the methodology for planning the cost of production by technical and economic factors using a conditional example.

Example. During the reporting year, the volume of marketable output at the enterprise amounted to 15 billion rubles, its cost - 12 billion rubles, including wages with deductions for social needs - 4.8 billion rubles, material resources - 6.0 billion rubles. Semi-fixed costs in the cost of production amounted to 50%. In the planning period, it is envisaged, through the implementation of the plan of organizational and technical measures, to increase the volume of marketable output by 15%, increase labor productivity by 10%, and average wages by 8%. The consumption rates of material resources will decrease by an average of 5%, while their prices will increase by 6%.

Determine the planned cost of commercial products and planned costs for 1 rub. commodity products.

Solution

1. Determine the cost of 1 rub. marketable products in the reporting period:

12:15 = 0.8 rub.

2. We calculate the planned costs for the release of marketable products, if in the planning period the costs of 1 rub. of marketable products remained at the level of the reporting period:

15 1.15 0.8 = 13.8 billion rubles.

3. We determine the amount of change in the cost of production due to the implementation of organizational and technical measures in the planned period:

a) by increasing labor productivity

i.e. due to this factor, the cost of production will decrease by 0.8%;

b) by changing the volume of production

those. due to this factor, the cost of production will decrease by 6.5%;

c) due to changes in norms and prices for material resources

those. due to this factor, the cost of production will increase by 0.35%.

The total value of the reduction in the cost of production due to the influence of all factors will be:

4. Determine the planned cost of production:

13.8 0.9305 = 12.84 billion rubles

5. We determine the planned costs for 1 rub. commercial products:

12.84: 17.25 \u003d 0.74 rubles,

where 17.25 is the planned volume of marketable output (15 x 1.15). Thus, the cost of 1 rub. marketable products decreased by 7.5% (0.74: 0.8 x 100 = 92,5%).

This work Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period. The cost of commercial products (Control) for the subject (AHD and the financial analysis), was performed according to custom order specialists of our company and passed its successful defense. Work - Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period. The cost of commercial products on the subject of AHD and financial analysis reflects its topic and the logical component of its disclosure, the essence of the issue under study is disclosed, the main provisions and leading ideas of this topic are highlighted.
Work - Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period. The cost of commercial products, contains: tables, drawings, the latest literary sources, the year of delivery and defense of work - 2017. In work Determine the cost of commercial products in the planning period. The cost of commercial products (AHD and financial analysis) reveals the relevance of the research topic, reflects the degree of development of the problem, based on a deep assessment and analysis of scientific and methodological literature, in the work on the subject of AHD and financial analysis, the object of analysis and its questions are comprehensively considered, both from theoretical, and the practical side, the purpose and specific tasks of the topic under consideration are formulated, there is a logic of presentation of the material and its sequence.

Back to

The cost of marketable products includes all the costs of the enterprise for the production and marketing of marketable products in the context of cost items. The cost of goods sold is equal to the cost of goods sold minus the increased costs of the first year of mass production of new products, reimbursed from the fund for the development of new equipment, plus the production cost of products sold from the last year's leftovers. The costs reimbursed from the fund for the development of new equipment are included in the cost of commercial products, but are not included in the cost of products sold.

They are defined as the difference between the planned cost of the first year of mass production of products and the cost adopted when approving prices:

SR \u003d ST - ZN + (SP2 - SP1),
where CP - cost of goods sold
ST - cost of commercial products
ZN - increased costs of the first year of mass production of new products, reimbursed from the fund for the development of new technology
SP1, SP2 - the production cost of the balance of unsold (in warehouses and shipped) products, respectively, at the beginning and end of the year.

To analyze the level of cost at various enterprises or its dynamics over different periods of time, production costs should be reduced to the same volume. The cost of a unit of production (calculation) shows the costs of the enterprise for production and sale specific type products per natural unit. Costing is widely used in pricing, cost accounting, planning and comparative analysis.

Industrial enterprises in addition to the indicator of reducing the cost of a unit of production, they plan the cost of all marketable products in the absolute amount. When analyzing the implementation of the plan for the cost of commercial products, it is necessary to consider the actual consumption, identify deviations from the plan and outline measures to eliminate overspending and further reduce costs for each item.

Evaluation of the implementation of the plan at the cost of all marketable products is made according to the data on its actual volume and range, calculated according to the planned and actual cost of the reporting year.

In general, the cost of production consists of material costs, the cost of paying wages to workers and complex items of expenditure. An increase or decrease in costs for each element causes either an increase in the cost or a decrease in the cost of production. Therefore, when analyzing, it is necessary to check the costs of raw materials, materials, fuel and electricity, wage costs, shop, general factory and other costs.

Wage costs for production workers are reflected directly in cost items. The wages of auxiliary workers are mainly reflected in the items of expenses for the maintenance and operation of equipment, the wages of employees and engineers are included in shop and general factory expenses. The wages of workers employed in auxiliary production are included in the cost of steam, water, electricity and affect the cost of commercial products not directly, but indirectly, through those complex items that include the consumption of steam, water and electricity. Therefore, the analysis of wages, first of all, is carried out according to its general fund and funds certain categories industrial- production staff enterprises, regardless of in which articles this wage is reflected. After identifying the reasons that caused the change (deviation) in the payroll of certain categories of workers, it is possible to determine the extent to which these deviations affected different items of production costs.

The reduction in the cost of production is largely determined by the correct ratio of the growth rates of labor productivity and wage growth. The growth of labor productivity should outpace the growth of wages, thus ensuring a reduction in the cost of production.

The indicator of costs per 1 ruble of marketable output is determined based on the level of costs for the production of marketable products in relation to the cost of products in the wholesale prices of the enterprise.

This indicator not only characterizes the planned level of cost reduction, but also determines the level of profitability of marketable products. Its value depends both on the reduction in the cost of production, and on changes in wholesale prices, assortment and quality of products.

In terms of the cost of production at the enterprise, along with the cost of 1 rub. marketable products, there are the following indicators: the cost of certain types of products, the cost of marketable products, the reduction in the cost of comparable products.

Determining the planned cost of individual types of products serves as the basis for planning production costs. The planned cost of all marketable products is calculated on the basis of data on the volume of output of marketable products and the planned cost of individual types of products.

Evaluation of the implementation of the plan at the cost of all marketable products is carried out taking into account the changes in prices for materials and tariffs for transportation and energy that occurred during the reporting year.

To determine the task to reduce the cost of comparable commercial products, the cost is calculated for the entire range of products based on the volume of production provided for by the enterprise plan and taking into account the planned indicator for the level of costs per 1 rub. commercial products at wholesale prices.

Ways to reduce production costs

The decisive condition for cost reduction is continuous technical progress. Introduction of new technology, complex mechanization and automation production processes, improvement of technology, the introduction of progressive types of materials can significantly reduce the cost of production.

The cost of production is characterized by indicators expressing:

A) the total cost of all manufactured products and work performed by the enterprise for the planned (reporting) period - the cost of marketable products, comparable marketable products, sold products;
b) costs per unit of volume of work performed - the cost of a unit of certain types of marketable products, semi-finished products and production services (products of auxiliary workshops), costs per 1 rub. marketable products, the cost of 1 rub. regulatory clean production.

Cost reduction is planned according to two indicators: for comparable marketable products; at the cost of 1 rub. marketable products, if in the total output specific gravity compared to the previous year, production is small. Comparable marketable products include all its types produced at a given enterprise in the previous period in mass or serial order.

The most important indicators expressing the cost of production are the cost of all commercial products, the cost of 1 ruble of commercial products, the cost of a unit of production.

The sources of information for analyzing the cost of production are: form 2 "" and form 5 Appendix to the balance sheet of the enterprise's annual report, costing of marketable products and costing of certain types of products, consumption rates of material, labor and financial resources, cost estimates for production and their actual implementation, as well as other accounting and reporting data.

As part of the cost of production, variable and conditionally fixed costs (costs) are distinguished. Value variable costs changes with a change in the volume of products (works, services). Variables include material costs for production, as well as piecework wages of workers. The amount of semi-fixed costs does not change with a change in the volume of production (works, services). Conditionally fixed costs include depreciation, rent of premises, time wages of administrative and managerial and service personnel and other costs.

So, the task of the business plan for the cost of all marketable products has not been completed. The above-plan increase in the cost of production amounted to 58 thousand rubles, or 0.29% of the plan. This happened due to comparable marketable products. (A comparable product is not a new product that was already produced in the previous period, and therefore its output in the reporting period can be compared with the previous period).

Then it is necessary to establish how the plan was fulfilled for the cost of all marketable products in the context of individual costing items and determine which items have savings, and which ones have overruns. Let's present the relevant data in Table 1.

Table 1. (thousand rubles)

Indicators	The total cost of actually manufactured products		Deviation from the plan
	at the planned cost of the reporting year	at the actual cost of the reporting year	in thousand rubles
	at the planned cost of the reporting year	at the actual cost of the reporting year	in thousand rubles	to the plan for this article	to the full planned cost
Raw materials
Returnable waste (deductible)
Purchased products, semi-finished products and services of cooperative enterprises
Fuel and energy for technological purposes
Basic wages of key production workers
Additional wages for key production workers
Deductions for insurance
Expenditures for the preparation and development of the production of new products
Costs for the maintenance and operation of equipment
General production (general shop) expenses
General business (general factory) expenses
Loss from marriage
Other operating expenses
Total production cost of marketable products
Selling expenses (sales expenses)
Total total cost of commercial products: (14+15)

As you can see, the increase in the actual cost of commercial products compared to the planned one is caused by overspending of raw materials and materials, additional wages of production workers, an increase against the plan of other production costs and the presence of losses from marriage. For the rest of the calculation items, savings take place.

We considered the grouping of the cost of production by costing items (cost items). This grouping characterizes the purpose of the costs and the place of their occurrence. Another grouping is also used - according to homogeneous economic elements. Here, the costs are grouped by economic content, i.e. regardless of their designated purpose and where they are spent. These elements are as follows:

material costs;
labor costs;
deductions for insurance;
depreciation of fixed assets (funds);
other costs (depreciation of intangible assets, rent, obligatory insurance payments, interest on bank loans, taxes included in the cost of production, deductions to off-budget funds, travel expenses and etc.).

When analyzing, it is necessary to determine the deviations of the actual production costs by elements from the planned ones, which are contained in the estimate of production costs.

So, the analysis of the cost of production in the context of costing items and homogeneous economic elements allows us to determine the amount of savings and cost overruns. certain types costs and promotes the search for reserves to reduce the cost of products (works, services).

Cost analysis for 1 ruble of marketable products

— relative indicator, which characterizes the share of the cost in the wholesale price of products. It is calculated according to the following formula:

Costs per 1 ruble of marketable products is the total cost of a marketable product divided by the cost of a marketable product at wholesale prices (without value added tax).

This indicator is expressed in kopecks. It gives an idea of how many kopecks of costs, i.e. the cost price, falls on each ruble of the wholesale price of products.

Initial data for analysis.

Costs per 1 ruble of marketable products according to the plan: 85.92 kopecks.

Costs per 1 ruble of actually produced marketable products:

according to the plan recalculated for the actual output and range of products: 85.23 kopecks.
actually in the prices in force in the reporting year: 85.53 kopecks.
actually in the prices accepted in the plan: 85.14 kopecks.

On the basis of these data, we determine the deviation of the actual costs per 1 ruble of marketable output in prices in effect in the reporting year from the costs according to the plan. To do this, subtract line 1 from line 2b:

85,53 — 85,92 = - 0.39 kopecks.

So, the actual figure is less than planned by 0.39 kopecks. Let us find the influence of individual factors on this deviation.

To determine the impact of a change in the structure of output, we compare the costs according to the plan, recalculated for the actual output and range of products, and the costs according to the plan, i.e. lines 2a and 1:

85.23 - 85.92 \u003d - 0.69 kop.

It means that by changing the structure of products the analyzed indicator has decreased. This is the result of an increase in the proportion of more profitable types of products that have a relatively low level of costs per ruble of products.

We will determine the impact of changes in the cost of individual types of products by comparing the actual costs in prices accepted in the plan with the planned costs recalculated for the actual output and range of products, i.e. lines 2c and 2a:

85.14 - 85.23 \u003d -0.09 kop.

So, by reducing the cost of certain types of products the indicator of costs per 1 ruble of marketable products decreased by 0.09 kopecks.

To calculate the impact of changes in prices for materials and tariffs, we will divide the amount of change in the cost price due to changes in these prices by the actual marketable products in the wholesale prices adopted in the plan. In the example under consideration, due to the increase in prices for materials and tariffs, the cost of commercial products increased by + 79 thousand rubles. Consequently, the cost of 1 ruble of marketable output due to this factor increased by:

(23,335 thousand rubles - actual marketable products in wholesale prices adopted in the plan).

The influence of changes in wholesale prices for the products of this enterprise on the cost indicator for 1 ruble of marketable products will be determined as follows. First, let's determine the overall influence of 3 and 4 factors. To do this, we compare the actual costs per 1 ruble of marketable output, respectively, in the prices in force in the reporting year and in the prices adopted in the plan, i.e. lines 2b and 2c, we determine the impact of price changes on both materials and products:

85.53 - 85.14 = + 0.39 kop.

Of this value, the impact of prices on materials is + 0.33 kopecks. Consequently, the impact of product prices accounts for + 0.39 - (+ 0.33) = + 0.06 kopecks. This means that the decrease in wholesale prices for the products of this enterprise increased the cost of 1 ruble of marketable products by + 0.06 kopecks. The total influence of all factors (balance of factors) is:

0.69 kop. - 0.09 kop. + 0.33 kop. + 0.06 kop. = - 0.39 kop.

Thus, the decrease in the cost indicator per 1 ruble of marketable output took place mainly due to a change in the structure of output, as well as due to a decrease in the cost of certain types of products. At the same time, an increase in prices for materials and tariffs, as well as a decrease in wholesale prices for the products of this enterprise increased costs by 1 ruble of marketable products.

Material cost analysis

The main place in the cost industrial products occupy material costs, i.e. costs for raw materials, materials, purchased semi-finished products, components, fuel and energy, equated to material costs.

The share of material costs is about three-quarters of the cost of production. It follows that the saving of material costs to a decisive extent ensures a reduction in the cost of production, which means an increase in profits and an increase in profitability.

The most important source of information for analysis is the calculation of the cost of production, as well as the calculation of individual products.

The analysis begins with a comparison of the actual material costs with the planned ones, adjusted for the actual volume of production.

Material costs at the enterprise increased in comparison with their envisaged value in the amount of 94 thousand rubles. This increased the cost of production by the same amount.

Three main factors influence the amount of material costs:

change in the specific consumption of materials per unit of production;
change in the procurement cost of a unit of material;
replacing one material with another material.

1) The change (reduction) in the specific consumption of materials per unit of production is achieved by reducing the material consumption of products, as well as by reducing the waste of materials in the production process.

The material consumption of products, which is the share of material costs in the price of products, is determined at the stage of product design. Directly in the process current activities enterprises, the reduction in the specific consumption of materials depends on the reduction in the amount of waste in the production process.

There are two types of waste: returnable and non-returnable. Returnable waste materials are further used in production, or sold to the side. Irrevocable waste is not subject to further use. Returnable waste is excluded from production costs, since it is again added to the warehouse as materials, but waste is received not at the price of full value, i.e. raw materials, but at the price of their possible use, which is much less.

Consequently, the violation of the specified specific consumption of materials, which caused the presence of excess waste, increased the cost of production by the amount:

57.4 thousand rubles - 7 thousand rubles. = 50.4 thousand rubles.

The main reasons for changing the specific consumption of materials are:

a) change in material processing technology;
b) change in the quality of materials;
c) replacement of missing materials with other materials.

2. Change in the procurement cost of a unit of material. The procurement cost of materials includes the following main elements:

a) the wholesale price of the supplier (purchase price);
b) transportation and procurement costs. The value of purchase prices for materials does not directly depend on the current activities of the enterprise, and the value of transportation and procurement costs depends, since these costs are usually borne by the buyer. They are under the influence following factors: a) changes in the composition of suppliers remote from the buyer at different distances; b) changes in the method of delivery of materials;
c) changes in the degree of mechanization of loading and unloading operations.

Wholesale prices of suppliers for materials increased against provided by the plan for 79 thousand rubles. So, the total increase in the procurement cost of materials due to the growth of wholesale prices of suppliers for materials and the increase in transport and procurement costs is 79 + 19 = 98 thousand rubles.

3) the replacement of one material with another material also leads to a change in the cost of materials for production. This can be called in various ways specific consumption, and different procurement costs of the replaced and replacing materials. The influence of the replacement factor will be determined by the balance method, as the difference between the total deviation of actual material costs from planned ones and the influence of already known factors, i.e. specific consumption and procurement cost:

94 - 50.4 - 98 \u003d - 54.4 thousand rubles.

So, the replacement of materials led to savings in the cost of materials for production in the amount of 54.4 thousand rubles. Substitutions of materials can be of two types: 1) forced replacements that are unprofitable for the enterprise.

After considering the total amount of material costs, the analysis should be detailed by individual types of materials and by individual products made from them in order to specifically identify ways to save various kinds materials.

Let us determine the influence of individual factors on the cost of material (steel) for product A using the difference method:

Table No. 18 (thousand rubles)

The influence on the amount of material costs of individual factors is: 1) change in the specific consumption of material:

1.5 * 5.0 = 7.5 rubles.

2) change in the procurement cost of a unit of material:

0.2 * 11.5 \u003d + 2.3 rubles.

The total influence of the two factors (balance of factors) is: +7.5 + 2.3 = + 9.8 rubles.

So, the excess of the actual costs of this type of material over the planned ones is mainly caused by the overplanned specific consumption, as well as an increase in the procurement cost. Both should be viewed negatively.

The analysis of material costs should be completed by calculating the reserves for reducing the cost of production. At the analyzed enterprise, the reserves for reducing the cost of production in terms of material costs are:

elimination of the reasons for the occurrence of excess returnable waste materials in the production process: 50.4 thousand rubles.
reduction of transportation and procurement costs to the planned level: 19 thousand rubles.
implementation of organizational and technical measures aimed at saving raw materials and materials (there is no reserve amount, since the planned measures have been fully implemented).

Total reserves for reducing the cost of production in terms of material costs: 69.4 thousand rubles.

Payroll cost analysis

When analyzing, it is necessary to assess the degree of validity of the forms and systems of remuneration used at the enterprise, check compliance with the savings regime in spending money on wages, study the ratio of growth rates of labor productivity and average wages, and also identify reserves for further reducing the cost of production by eliminating the causes unproductive payments.

The sources of information for analysis are product cost estimates, data statistical form labor report f. No. 1-t, application data to the balance f. No. 5, materials accounting on payroll, etc.

At the analyzed enterprise, the planned and actual data on the payroll can be seen from the following table:

Table No. 18

(thousand roubles.)

This table separately highlights the wages of workers who receive mainly piecework wages, the amount of which depends on changes in the volume of production, and the wages of other categories of personnel, which do not depend on the volume of production. Therefore, the wages of workers are variable, and the rest of the categories of personnel are constant.

In the analysis, we first determine the absolute and relative deviation in the wage fund of industrial and production personnel. The absolute deviation is equal to the difference between the actual and basic (planned) wage funds:

6282.4 - 6790.0 = + 192.4 thousand rubles.

The relative deviation is the difference between the actual payroll fund and the basic (planned) fund, recalculated (adjusted) for the percentage change in output, taking into account a special conversion factor. This coefficient characterizes the share of variable (piecework) wages, depending on changes in the volume of production, in the total amount of the wage fund. At the analyzed enterprise, this coefficient is 0.6. The actual volume of output is 102.4% of the base (planned) output. Based on this, the relative deviation in the wage bill industrial production staff is:

So, the absolute overspending on the wage fund of industrial personnel is 192.4 thousand rubles, and taking into account changes in the volume of production, the relative overspending amounted to 94.6 thousand rubles.

Then we should analyze the wage bill of workers, the value of which is mainly variable. The absolute deviation here is:

5560.0 - 5447.5 = + 112.5 thousand rubles.

Let's define the way absolute differences influence on this deviation of two factors:

change in the number of workers; (quantitative, extensive factor);
change in the average annual wage of one worker (qualitative, intensive factor);

Initial data:

Table No. 19

(thousand roubles.)

The influence of individual factors on the deviation of the actual wage fund of workers from the planned one is:

Change in the number of workers:

51 * 1610.3 \u003d 82125.3 rubles.

Change in the average annual wage of one worker:

8.8 * 3434 = + 30219.2 rubles.

The total influence of the two factors (balance of factors) is:

RUB 82125.3 + 30219.2 rubles. = + 112344.5 rubles. = + 112.3 thousand rubles.

Consequently, the overspending on the wage fund of workers was formed mainly due to an increase in the number of workers. The increase in the average annual wage per worker also contributed to this overspending, but to a lesser extent.

The relative variance in the wage bill of workers is calculated without taking into account the conversion factor, since for the sake of simplicity it is assumed that all workers receive piecework wages, the amount of which depends on the change in output. Therefore, this relative deviation is equal to the difference between the actual wage fund of workers and the basic (planned) fund, recalculated (adjusted) for the percentage change in output:

So, for the wage fund of workers there is an absolute overspending in the amount of + 112.5 thousand rubles, and taking into account the change in the volume of production, there is a relative saving in the amount of - 18.2 thousand rubles.

additional payments to pieceworkers in connection with a change in working conditions;
overtime pay;
payment for all-day downtime and hours of intra-shift downtime.

The analyzed enterprise has unproductive payments of the second type in the amount of 12.5 thousand rubles. and the third type for 2.7 thousand rubles.

So, the reserves for reducing the cost of production in terms of labor costs are the elimination of the causes of unproductive payments in the amount of: 12.5 + 2.7 = 15.2 thousand rubles.

Next, the payroll of the remaining categories of personnel is analyzed, i.e. managers, professionals and other employees. This wage is a semi-permanent expense that does not depend on the degree of change in the volume of production, since these employees receive certain salaries. Therefore, only the absolute deviation is determined here. Exceeding the base value of the wage fund is recognized as an unjustified overspending, the elimination of the causes of which is a reserve for reducing the cost of production. At the analyzed enterprise, the reserve for cost reduction is the amount of 99.4 thousand rubles, which can be mobilized by eliminating the causes of overspending on the wage funds of managers, specialists and other employees.

A necessary condition for reducing the cost of production in terms of wage costs is that the growth rate of labor productivity outstrips the growth rate of average wages. At the analyzed enterprise, labor productivity, i.e. the average annual output per worker increased compared to the plan by 1.2%, and the average annual wage per worker by 1.6%. Therefore, the lead factor is:

The outpacing growth of wages compared to labor productivity (this is the case in the example under consideration) leads to an increase in the cost of production. The impact on the cost of production of the ratio between the growth of labor productivity and average wages can be determined by the following formula:

At wages - Y produces labor multiplied by Y, divided by Y produces. labor.

where, Y is the share of wage costs in the total cost of marketable products.

The increase in the cost of production due to the outstripping growth of average wages compared to labor productivity is:

101,6 — 101,2 * 0,33 = + 0,013 %

or (+0.013) * 19888 = +2.6 thousand rubles.

In conclusion of the analysis of wage costs, it is necessary to calculate the reserves for reducing the cost of production in terms of labor costs, identified as a result of the analysis:

1) Elimination of the reasons causing unproductive payments: 15.2 thousand rubles.
2) Elimination of the causes of unjustified overspending on payroll funds for managers, specialists and other employees 99.4 thousand rubles.
3) Implementation of organizational and technical measures to reduce labor costs, and consequently, wages for output: -

Total reserves for reducing the cost of production in terms of wage costs: 114.6 thousand rubles.

Analysis of costs for production maintenance and management

These costs mainly include the following items in the calculation of the cost of production:

a) the cost of maintaining and operating the equipment;
b) overhead costs;
c) general business expenses;

Each of these items consists of different cost elements. The main purpose of the analysis is to find reserves (opportunities) to reduce costs for each item.

The sources of information for analysis are the calculation of the cost of production, as well as analytical accounting registers - sheet No. 12, which records the costs of maintaining and operating equipment and overhead costs, and sheet No. 15, which keeps records of general business expenses.

The costs of maintaining and operating equipment are variable, i.e., they directly depend on changes in the volume of production. Therefore, the basic (as a rule, planned) amounts of these expenses should first be recalculated (adjusted) by the percentage of the plan for output (102.4%). However, in the composition of these expenses there are conditionally constant items that do not depend on changes in the volume of production: “Depreciation of equipment and intrashop transport”, “Depreciation of intangible assets”. These articles are not subject to recalculation.

The actual costs are then compared with the recalculated base amounts and variances determined.

Expenses for the maintenance and operation of equipment

Table No. 21

(thousand roubles.)

Composition of expenses:	Adjusted plan	Actually	Deviation from the adjusted plan
Depreciation of equipment and intrashop transport:

Operation of equipment (consumption of energy and fuel, lubricants, salary of equipment adjusters with deductions):	(1050 x 102.4) / 100 = 1075.2
Repair of equipment and intrashop transport:	(500 x 102.4) / 100 = 512
Intra-factory movement of goods:	300 x 102.4 / 100 = 307.2
Wear of tools and production fixtures:	120 x 102.4 / 100 = 122.9
Other expenses:	744 x 102.4 / 100 = 761.9
Total expenses for the maintenance and operation of equipment:

In general, there is an overrun for this type of expenditure compared to the adjusted plan in the amount of 12.8 thousand rubles. However, if we do not take into account the savings on individual items of expenditure, then the amount of unjustified overspending on depreciation, operation of equipment and its repair will be 60 + 4.8 + 17 = 81.8 thousand rubles. Eliminating the causes of this unlawful overspending is a reserve for reducing the cost of production.

General production and general business expenses are conditionally fixed, i.e. they do not directly depend on changes in the volume of production.

overhead costs

Table No. 22

(thousand roubles.)

Indicators	Estimate (plan)	Actually	Deviation (3-2)
Labor costs (with accruals) management personnel shop and other shop personnel
Amortization of intangible assets
Depreciation of buildings, structures and inventory of workshops

Repair of buildings, structures and inventory of workshops
Expenses for tests, experiments and research
Occupational health and safety
Other expenses (including depreciation of inventory)
Overhead costs: a) losses from downtime due to internal reasons b) shortage and loss of damage to material assets
Excess material assets (subtracted)
Total overhead costs

In general, for this type of expenditure, there is a saving in the amount of 1 thousand rubles. At the same time, for some items, there is an excess of the estimate in the amount of 1 + 1 + 15 + 3 + 26 = 46 thousand rubles.

Eliminating the causes of this unjustified overspending will reduce the cost of production. Especially negative is the presence of non-productive costs (shortages, losses from damage and downtime).

Then we analyze general expenses.

General running costs

Table #23

(thousand roubles.)

Indicators	Estimate (plan)	Actually	Deviations (4 - 3)
Labor costs (with accruals) of the administrative and managerial personnel of the plant management:
The same for other general staff:
Amortization of intangible assets:
Depreciation of buildings, structures and general household equipment:

Production of tests, experiments, research and maintenance of general laboratories:
Occupational Safety and Health:
Personnel training:
Organized Recruitment of Workers:
Other general expenses:
Taxes and fees:
Overhead costs: a) losses from downtime due to external reasons: b) shortages and losses from damage to material assets: c) other unproductive expenses:
Excluded income surplus material assets:
Total general expenses:

In general, there is an overspending in the amount of 47 thousand rubles for general business expenses. However, the amount of unbalanced overspending (i.e. without taking into account the savings available for individual items) is 15 + 24 + 3 + 8 + 7 + 12 = 69 thousand rubles. Eliminating the causes of this overspending will reduce the cost of production.

Savings on certain items of general production and general business expenses may be unjustified. This includes such items as expenditure on labor protection, testing, experiments, research, and training. If there are savings on these items, you should check what caused them. There can be two reasons for this: 1) the corresponding costs are made more economically. In this case, the savings are justified. 2) Most often, savings are the result of the fact that the planned measures for labor protection, experiments and research, etc. have not been completed. Such savings are unjustified.

At the analyzed enterprise, as part of general business expenses, there are unjustified savings under the item "Training of personnel" in the amount of 13 thousand rubles. It is caused by the incomplete implementation of the planned training measures.

So, as a result of the analysis, an unjustified overspending on the costs of maintaining and operating equipment (81.8 thousand rubles), on general production costs (46 thousand rubles) and on general business expenses (69 thousand rubles) was revealed.

The total amount of unjustified cost overruns for these cost items is: 81.8 + 46 + 69 = 196.8 thousand rubles.

However, as a reserve for cost reduction in terms of production maintenance and management costs, it is advisable to take only 50% of this unjustified overspending, i.e.

196.8 * 50% = 98.4 thousand rubles.

Here, only 50% of unjustified overspending is conditionally accepted as a reserve in order to eliminate the repeated expense account (materials, wages). When analyzing material costs and wages, reserves have already been identified to reduce these costs. But both material costs and wages are included in the cost of servicing production and management.

In conclusion of the analysis, we summarize the identified reserves for reducing the cost of production:

in terms of material costs, the amount of the reserve is 69.4 thousand rubles. by eliminating above-planned returnable waste of materials and reducing transportation and procurement costs to the planned level;

in terms of wage costs - the amount of the reserve is 114.6 thousand rubles. by eliminating the causes of unproductive payments and the causes of unjustified overspending on payroll funds for managers, specialists and other employees;

in terms of expenses for maintenance of production and management - the amount of the reserve is 98.4 thousand rubles. by eliminating the causes of unjustified cost overruns for the maintenance and operation of equipment, general production and general business expenses.

So, the cost of production may decrease by 69.4 +114.6 + 98.4 = 282.4 thousand rubles. The profit of the analyzed enterprise will increase by the same amount.