Micro Four Thirds mount lenses - prices. Micro Four Thirds Mount Lenses - Prices Micro 4 3 System Optics

Constantine Voronin

2015-01-14 19:29:00

In such conditions, shooting can be compared with an iPhone ... But it does not follow from this that the iPhone shoots better than Olympus :)

Vladimir Khudyakov

2015-01-14 20:13:00

Why are you cheating?

2015-01-14 22:20:00

I immediately determined where the camera was. It's very simple, a double crop at wide angle shows strong geometric distortion, even at moderately wide. For example, on a full frame at 24mm, distortions are not very visible, but to achieve the same picture on 2 crop, you need a 12mm lens, and 12mm distorts already (I'm not talking about 7mm). This is especially clearly seen in the city, when the lines of buildings collapse with a seemingly moderate wide-angle lens and such distortions cannot be completely corrected.

2015-01-15 00:12:00

Dmitry, you write nonsense, sorry. The focal length itself does not determine lens distortion. Distortion depends on the angle of view of the lens, well, on design features specific lens. On a double crop of 12mm, the viewing angle corresponds to 24 on a full frame or 16mm on a "one and a half" crop (the list goes on for different sizes matrices). Regarding system 43: in it, the lens geometry is corrected in-camera even in RAW (for proprietary optics). Regarding the pictures presented here: how did you determine STRONG geometric distortions on frames that do not have a single straight line? And which one is better in this case? Maybe someone else has a strong "pillow"? And to be honest, geometrically, these two images differ minimally. Regarding noise: Of course, a full frame potentially makes less noise, but it is quite comparable and it manifests itself rather in extreme conditions. To confirm all of the above: see the picture. ISO 6400, shutter speed 1/3 sec without a tripod - thanks to the excellent stabilizer (try shooting on FF), focal length 12mm - pay attention to geometric distortions. Camera Olympus OM-D E-M1. The matrix is ​​almost the same as in the E-M10. A test frame, one of the first after the purchase, nothing was corrected, it appeared by default in the LR. P.S. I switched to mikra from Nikon's crop and I do not regret it.

2015-01-15 00:39:00

You misunderstood me and were even more rude. I didn't say a word about the nature of the distortions. These distortions (perspective or geometric) appear relative to the normal focal length of 50mm. This may well be called distortion, and therefore distortion depends on the focal length. Apparently I hit you hard. I owned both a full frame and a crop twice, I'm not talking from the ceiling. I shoot professionally and came to the conclusion that double crop is not an option for my purposes. And I explained why. I'll leave the frame without comment. There is no purpose to offend the owners of 4/3, I just want to clarify. PS: If you are satisfied with the maximum ISO 6400 and noise, as well as the geometry at the focal length of 7-14mm, then rejoice, you have exactly the device that you need, but do not think that other people write nonsense and stupider than you. You just misunderstood them.

2015-01-15 01:21:00

Dmitry, I beg your pardon, I did not mean to offend you. Essentially, a focal length of 50mm is normal for a 36 x 24mm frame and gives an angle of view of approximately 45 degrees diagonally across the frame. For other sizes of the matrix, lenses with other focal lengths will be "normal", i.e. providing an angle of 45-50 degrees (approximate angle of perception of the eye). At the same time, they will not become either "wide" (25mm by 43) or "telephoto" (100mm in large format). It can be the same optical scheme, proportionally recalculated for different frame coverage. Perspective and geometric distortion will be completely identical. Distortions at the "over-wide" 7mm are quite comparable with the "over-wide" 14 mm for ff. Rather, in this case, they depend on the specific design. I am not a professional photographer; I don't make money for her. Rather spend :-) . But quite consciously I have been fond of this business for about 30 years. And once upon a time I was quite professionally engaged in the repair of photographic and film equipment. So, I imagine what, why and how, and a great many techniques passed through my hands. In which you are absolutely right - everyone determines for himself whether this technique is good for him personally. And I am completely far from saying that 4/3 is the best.

2015-01-15 01:47:00

And one more thing: 50mm is not at all some sacred-optimal focal length. It just so happened historically that film with a frame size of 36 x 24 mm (or so) was most widely used, which, in order to get a picture similar to what a person sees with the naked eye, required optics with a focus of about 50 mm, and number convenient for determining the magnification of lenses. Another "standard" of the frame would have won, and a normal lens would have been with different focal lengths. At the same time, their scheme, I repeat, could be exactly the same. And FF - the same was once a crop from a very common frame at that time 6 x 4.5 cm, or even more so 6 x 9 cm.

2015-01-15 02:20:00

Unfortunately, on a real example from my life, I did not see the full equivalent, but I really wanted to. I really wanted to leave FF for 4/3 but it didn't work out. 7-14 gave a completely different picture than 16-35 precisely in geometry, in other parameters it was tolerable. The noise was also wild, despite the top device in the 4/3 segment (Panasonic GH4), and the ISO limit did not give freedom to shoot in natural light. In addition to photos, I also shoot videos. Of course, I heard about the large format. Never took a picture of him. Perhaps this is a matter of habit, as I always shot at "full frame" and once I tried 4/3, I was very disappointed with these properties. I had to urgently return to FF, although it was already compact and without a mirror.

2015-01-15 12:15:00

7-14 and 16-35 are very different lenses (compare at least the front lens). An analogue of 7-14 at ff-14-28, with distortions corresponding to super-super-width, and it’s quite normal that you personally didn’t like them. And 16-35 on the mic is a 9-18 plover - an amateur lens. Plover 7-14 2.8 Pro should be released this year, but I think the price will be appropriate. Comparing the Panasonic GH4 with the Sony A7 (as I understand it, you switched to it) is not entirely correct: the GH4 has a previous generation matrix. See GH5. He also writes 4K video. But back to the pictures in the article. Please show the distortions that you immediately noticed on one of them and absent on the other.

This set of macro rings from aliexpress was purchased by me for the Panasonic Lumix G5 mirrorless camera

It's no secret that relatively inexpensive macro rings are often advised to try to understand whether macro photography is generally "yours" or not. After all, the price tag for macro lenses is many times more than the cost of macro rings.

For the MFT (micro 4/3) system, it is more difficult to find something for sale than for DSLRs, but the Chinese come to the rescue. Here is a link to the product page on aliexpress.

As stated by the seller, the rings are metal (not plastic). They come in a box, assembled. At the first unwinding, fine metal dust pours from them, so it makes sense to unwind them each separately for the first time, and not immediately hook the whole kit to the camera so that less dust gets on the lenses and matrix

As for the seller, despite the statement that the shipment takes place within 5 days, everything was sent to me the very next day. For tracking, they even give a track number, which, however, cannot be tracked on the site offered by aliexpress. But this number is perfectly tracked through [link] .

The goods were delivered to me in 20 days, which is not long, as I think.

Now about the rings themselves. This is how they look assembled:

All together it is about 5-7 cm thick, which is equal to the size of an average lens. For comparison, I put the rings in line with the lens park I have:

From left to right: whale 14-42, rings, fisheye 7.5, zoom 45-200. Photographed on Olympus 45 1.8.

The fact is that this system of macro rings is the simplest, and there are no contacts when attaching all this to the camera. This means that the shooting mode without a lens must be set in the camera, and then the whole process is done strictly by hand - there can be no automatic focusing here.

Therefore, the ideal thing here should be a lens where both aperture and focal length are set manually on the lens barrel. Of all the lens fleet I have, the fisheye meets these criteria. But... the structural features of very wide-angle lenses (which is fisheye) are such that when macro rings are attached to them, the focus point shifts inside the lens. That is, it is not realistic to shoot anything in focus with this lens with macro rings.

The second option for adjusting the focus is to change the focal length. Since I have a motorized whale 14-42, there was a zoom:

In the photo above, you can clearly see how half of the macro ring is attached to the inside of the lens. This part of the ring shows a red mark (connections to the red mark on the camera), as well as a mechanism for detaching the macro ring from the lens. By the way, this should be mentioned separately.

It's not exactly a button, it's more of a handle that needs to be pushed to the side so that you can remove the ring from the lens. This handle is not to say that it moves very easily. Rather rather tight. However, my feminine strength was enough to move it and remove the ring from the lens.

The greater the distance from the lens to the matrix, the more the image is enlarged. The two photos below show the difference in approximation. In the first photo of the bread crumb - only adapters are attached to the zoom, between which no rings are worn:

In the second photo, the thinnest ring of 7 mm is put between the adapters:

I did not attach the rest of the rings, because. More than enough for me. In addition, the main problem, as I wrote above, is to catch the focus. The focus point is approximately 5-7 cm from the lens. And only by changing the focal length a little bit, you can "catch" the focus. Despite the fact that this zoom is quite dark (aperture ranges from 5.6 to 6.3 at different ends of the zoom), this aperture cover is not enough to make everything in the frame more or less in focus (for macro shooting, it is recommended to cover the hole at least up to 10, or even better).

About the fact that shooting should be carried out strictly from a tripod, I think it's unnecessary to say.

In general, there are no complaints about the ring manufacturer (especially at a cost of 500 r) - everything is fine, but from the point of view of their ease of use, this is a moot point ...

One of the newest formats Micro 4/3(or, as it is often called, Micro Four Thirds) has only recently emerged. Despite the very “green” age of the standard, Micro 4/3 cameras are already very popular among amateur photographers. Today it celebrates its 7th anniversary - on August 5, 2008 the format was announced in Tokyo, Japan.

A lot has been achieved in the mirrorless world of photography over the past 7 years. Modern mirrorless cameras are practically not far behind their older DSLR counterparts, and every day there is more and more to buy a mirrorless camera in your arsenal. But let's not touch on the holivar ““ again, let's take a better look at how it all began.

The origin of the Micro 4/3 format goes back to 2002, when the company announced the standard 4/3 . It was developed jointly with the company and was intended for SLR cameras. The standard got its name from the aspect ratio of photographs, which, you guessed it, was 4:3.

Freshly baked format first found use in a DSLR Olympus E1, which was released in the summer of 2003. In comparison with SLR cameras from Nikon and Canon, the new Olympus is much more compact and lightweight. This was facilitated by a shorter working distance (38.67 mm) and small matrix dimensions (18 x 13.5 mm) - this is almost 4 times smaller than that of full-frame cameras.

Over the next 5 years, Olympus DSLRs sold very well - during this period of time 14 camera models were released and a good fleet of optics for them. But it was still very difficult to compete with the monsters of photo construction in the face. To a large extent, this was facilitated by the crop factor of the system, which was equal to two. It was difficult to get a shallow depth of field with it, which is very critical when shooting portraits. There were other drawbacks: high sensor noise, insufficient image sharpness, etc.

Something had to change, and Olympus, together with Panasonic August 5, 2008 presented an update of her brainchild - a new format Micro 4/3.

The revolutionary “feature” of the updated standard was the ability to get rid of the bulky mirror in the camera design, as well as to reduce the working distance by half. What does it give? At a minimum, a significant reduction in the design of both the camera and the lenses for it.

Instead of lugging around a big DSLR with huge lenses around your neck, Olympus and Panasonic came up with a small and compact alternative that enthusiasts quickly fell in love with. Olymous mirrorless prototype shown at Photokina 2008:

The Micro 4/3 format sensor has the same physical dimensions as the parent 4:3 sensor - 18 x 13.5 mm. But due to the absence in the design of the camera of the mechanism for lifting the mirror and the associated optical viewfinder, the working distance decreased to 19.25 mm. Instead of an optical viewfinder, an electronic viewfinder was proposed, which many initially did not like. The picture came to him with a slight delay, which made it completely impossible to shoot dynamic scenes. This is on the one hand. On the other hand, there were only advantages: the image entered the viewfinder directly from the matrix, and it could be seen as it would be at the output, i.e. after releasing the shutter button. Also, it is worth writing down 100% coverage of the frame field, the ability to output service information to the viewfinder and enhance the observed image in low light conditions.

Some models of cameras are not equipped with a viewfinder at all, which is why they are very similar to compacts. You need to sight on the screen, which works in LiveView mode.

Another important point was the integration of video capabilities. While DSLRs were just learning how to write video, Micro 4/3 format cameras could offer quite good opportunities. They still stand head and shoulders above. Remember how many recent models are able to write videos in 4K resolution - almost every second.

The development and introduction of the Micro 4/3 format was a key milestone in the evolution of mirrorless cameras. Seeing the huge potential in a new type of camera, in 2010 such giants of the world industry as Fujifilm, Sony and Samsung entered the mirrorless world. Over the next 5 years, mirrorless cameras have made an amazing breakthrough in their development. Particularly pleased Sony, which has released full-frame mirrorless cameras and is constantly improving them.

But what about Micro 4/3? The format remains in demand and is also being improved. Of the latest updates, one can single out an increase in sensor resolution from 16 MP to 20.3 MP (for the newly announced one) and the release of a bunch of models sharpened for shooting video in 4K resolution. The 5-axis matrix stabilization system, first used in Olympus' OM-D series cameras, also looks and works very cool.

Separately, a wide fleet of optics pleases - in addition to Olympus and Panasonic, lenses for Micro 4/3 are manufactured by Sigma, Tamron, Schneider Kreuznach, Voigtlander, SLR Magic, Samyang and Lensbaby. Therefore, you can choose from a mass of options, starting from your own needs and capabilities.

And what advantages and disadvantages do you see in the Micro 4/3 format? Leave your answers in the comments. We will be very interested to know your opinion.

Micro Four Thirds System is the most common portable system camera format developed jointly by Panasonic and Olympus. He entered the market mirrorless cameras and lenses for them, at least a year before the appearance of the first real competitor. The superiority and the presence of not one, but two large manufacturers is the main advantage of MFT technology. This becomes evident, for example, when comparing lens catalogues. Micro 4:3 has over 75 optics available from both Panasonic and Olympus, as well as third-party manufacturers including Sigma, Tamron, Samyang, Voigtlander, and more. This provides a large selection. Therefore, you should heed the advice of professionals in order to take right decisions about buying the best MFT lenses. Below are the most worthy models produced in accordance with this standard. Using adapters to Micro 4:3 allows you to install lenses with Leica M, Four Thirds and Olympus OM mounts.

Leica 200mm ƒ2.8

This is a silent telephoto lens for mirrorless Panasonic cameras and Olympus, in which its equivalent focal length reaches 400 mm. Mounts with a standard Micro 4:3 mount. Optical quality for near and far subjects is excellent across the frame, even at wide apertures, and the minimum focusing distance of just over 1m allows for impressive close-ups. Leica also includes a 1.4x teleconverter that converts the lens to ƒ4/280mm (560mm equivalent). This essentially matches the reach and aperture of the Olympus 300mm ƒ4, and is very much in line with its quality. This flexibility while maintaining a high standard appeals to many. If the budget allows, and a focal length of 200-280mm is preferred over 300mm, then this lens is an excellent addition to the system.

Leica DG 8-18mm ƒ2.8-4

This is the fourth Micro 4:3 ultra-wide zoom lens, and arguably the most compelling to date. While it may not scale as well as the Olympus and Lumix 7-14mm models, the extra coverage at the longer end makes it more flexible, and the ability to install standard (or even serious ND) filters without vignetting has been appreciated by many photographers, especially those that use long exposure. A Leica lens at wide apertures may not be as sharp in the corners as the Olympus 7-14mm and doesn't have a constant f-number, but in turn it's smaller, lighter and cheaper. The model outperforms the older Lumix 7-14mm ƒ4 by avoiding its purple artifact issues. With fast and quiet focusing, a sealed body with smooth adjustment rings, this is a lens that is easy to recommend. According to user reviews, it is their favorite ultra-wide zoom for Panasonic and Olympus cameras, and a tempting upgrade for Lumix 7-14mm ƒ4 or Olympus 9-18mm owners.

Leica DG 100-400mm ƒ4-6.3

This is a super telephoto zoom for the Micro 4:3 system. Designed for Olympus and Panasonic Lumix bodies, the lens offers a 200-800mm equivalent range with wider coverage than any other lens, making it ideal for wildlife photographers. It features high quality lenses and build compared to existing telephoto lenses, although it costs much more. A cheaper alternative is the still unbeatable Lumix 100-300mm, but if Leica is affordable, then you have to ask yourself if it's worth getting a little closer to the Olympus 300mm ƒ4 Prime. But if you need a quality super-telephoto zoom, then this model will provide everything you need, filling an important gap in the MFT catalog.

Leica DG 12mm ƒ1.4

This is a high-end lens for MFT bodies that delivers classic 24mm coverage. Olympus and Samyang offer cheaper, lighter, smaller 12mm lenses, but the Summilux is a step brighter, sharper in the corners at maximum aperture, and the only one that's dust and splash resistant. It's about twice as expensive as Olympus, so it's up to you to see if its benefits will be claimed. Ultimately, the Summilux is a premium silent lens that does what it's supposed to do and is a welcome addition to the extensive MFT catalog.

Olympus 8mm ƒ1.8 Fisheye

This is the first f1.8 fisheye lens that allows you to shoot in low light without increasing sensitivity. Even at full aperture, the optic delivers very sharp detail in corners, making it a great choice for interior photography. It is great for action and extreme sports, still image and video shooting, especially since its body is protected from dust and moisture. Many people are skeptical about the usefulness of this type of lens, but the Fisheye delivers much more than expected in terms of aperture, quality and build. They make it much more flexible than low-aperture models. An alternative is the inexpensive Samyang 8mm ƒ3.5 lens.

Olympus 7-14mm ƒ2.8

The ultra wide-angle zoom provides a range of 14-28mm (equivalent) with a constant aperture of f2.8. Its specs are on par with the Lumix G 7-14mm, but it's brighter and boasts some weather protection. Like the Lumix G, a built-in hood means there's no standard filter thread on the front, but third-party lens adapters (like Lee's) can be purchased. The larger aperture and stiffer design means it's larger, heavier and more expensive than its counterpart. However, the lens is a step up in every way, and it doesn't have the purple flare that Lumix suffers from on some bodies.

Lumix 30mm ƒ2.8 Macro

It cannot be denied that this is the most advantageous high-end macro optics. This is arguably the cheapest way to enjoy true 1:1 autofocus reproduction on one of the best Micro 4:3 lenses, and the manufacturer doesn't seem to have compromised on quality. Users consider the only drawback of the model to be the lack of a focus limiter, which could improve AF speed for non-macro shots, but even with the full focus range, AF is fast enough. Considering its close to standard coverage makes it the most flexible of the 3 MFT macro lenses, it is a very attractive option for Panasonic or Olympus owners interested in shooting close-up.

Panasonic Lumix G 42.5mm ƒ1.7

This is a short telephoto lens that takes on the hugely popular Olympus 45mm ƒ1.8. In user testing, the Lumix delivers greater sharpness in corners at large apertures and is able to focus much closer, double-duty as a primary macro lens. It has optical stabilization (for owners of Panasonic cases without such functionality). While the lens outperforms the Olympus in many tests, the latter provides better rendering of out-of-focus areas and is typically sold at a heavy discount. Both models are excellent choices and are highly recommended by professionals.

Olympus 40-150mm ƒ2.8 Pro

This is a high-end telephoto lens with a constant aperture of f2.8. 80-300mm range (50mm equivalent) ideal for portrait, street and outdoor photography wildlife and sports competitions. The lens is fast, dustproof and waterproof, and delivers very sharp and high-contrast images in the corners even at maximum aperture. The focal range is much longer than the competing Lumix 35-100mm ƒ2.8, although its physical dimensions are larger. Many people prefer to shoot with faster lenses to achieve a shallower depth of field, but if the capabilities of the lens seem sufficient, then it is worth including in your collection.

Panasonic Leica 15mm ƒ1.7

This is a high quality general purpose lens for Olympus cameras and Panasonic, which is priced below alternatives. Its 30mm full-frame equivalent focal length is unique. However, it is ideal for universal optics. The lens is a bit wide for traditional portraits, but landscapes, architecture and even shallow depth of field shots are within its remit, and the optical quality is a step up from comparable focal length alternatives. Pros advise using the Summimux 15mm if your budget allows, instead of the cheaper Olympus 17mm ƒ1.8. This is especially true for GM1 or GM5 owners as they pair well. If you already have an Olympus Micro 4:3 17mm ƒ1.8 lens, then buying Panasonic is hardly worth it. Of course, his optics are a little better, but not enough to replace an alternative model.

Panasonic Leica 25mm ƒ1.4

This is a standard Micro 4:3 lens with an effective focal length of 50mm. It was the second model released by Panasonic under the Leica brand for the MFT. Leica designs the optics while Panasonic manufactures them in Japan. The build quality and adjustment ring are of a high standard and provide excellent results. Aperture ratio allows you to work in low light and get a shallow depth of field, which is great for close-up portraits. Owners report that they find it easier to photograph portraits of children with this lens than with longer focal lengths. However, some users of Olympus cameras report random noise during framing when adjusting the aperture. Several 25mm variants are now available for the Micro Four Thirds, but many still remain loyal to this old but solid model.

Panasonic Leica 42.5mm ƒ1.2

The Leica Nocticron is undoubtedly a high-end portrait lens. Its 42.5mm focal length is equivalent to 85mm full-frame, making it a classic choice for portraiture, while f1.2 aperture provides shallow depth of field. What's really impressive is how much the lens manages to sharpen corners even at its maximum aperture, making it extremely useful in low light. Suffice it to say that unfocused areas are also exemplary. The only drawback, apart from the size, is the price corresponding to the high quality of the model. Luckily, there are plenty of great MFT short telephoto lenses in case the Nocticron is out of your pocket, but for those who demand the best, it's indispensable.

Panasonic Lumix 7-14mm ƒ4

MFT camera owners can choose from 3 ultra-wide zoom lenses, and each one is recommended by professionals. Lumix G 7-14mm with a range of 14-28mm (equivalent) delivers excellent results across the frame even at maximum aperture. It features a built-in lens hood that does a great job of protecting the optics from bumps, scratches and stray light. On the other hand, you can't install filters without a homemade lens adapter, and owners of Olympus bodies may suffer from purple artifacts when shooting bright lights. Priced between the less extreme 9-18mm and higher end 7-14mm ƒ2.8 optics, it remains a popular choice and a favorite of professional users.

Olympus M Zuiko Digital 75mm ƒ1.8

The Japanese manufacturer continues to produce high-end lenses in a metal body. This model offers 150mm-equivalent wide-aperture telephoto shooting, making it ideal for serious portraiture as well as fine detailing in landscapes and urban environments. Keeping the aperture ratio of f1.8 at longer focal lengths came with a cost increase (roughly double the 45mm ƒ1.8) and, despite being a solid build, it's not watertight. Panasonic camera owners should be aware that, like all Olympus lenses, there is no optical stabilization, so they need to shoot with enough high speed shutter or on a tripod. But even with these reservations, the model remains very desirable, especially for serious portrait painters.

Olympus M Zuiko Digital 17mm ƒ1.8

This is the main lens intended for general use. With a 34mm equivalent focal length, it provides a field of view that is almost identical to the classic 35mm optics adored by street photographers. Thus, it is wider than 50mm and does not suffer from the distortion of 28mm lenses. This makes it ideal for day to day use, and its light weight and small size mean the owner is unlikely to notice that it is installed. A large aperture is useful in low light and also allows you to create bokeh, especially if the subject is close to the minimum focusing distance. With enough care with distance and composition, you can even shoot a portrait. The disadvantages of the lens include the optional lens hood, the lack of protection against dust and moisture, and a rather high cost. However, its quality is high, so it is most in demand, especially for those who have not yet acquired 20mm optics.

Today we really have the richest choice of optics for Micro Four systems. Olympus and Panasonic have created a wide range of amazing, affordable and very high quality lenses. We are going to offer you a range of models, a set of which will allow you to create excellent images in various shooting situations.

technical material

First, let's look at the technical part, so that in the future it will be easier for you to understand other things.

This is a small note to Micro Four Thirds lenses. Depth of field is directly related to sensor size: the larger the sensor, the shallower the depth of field can be achieved. This means that an f/1.8 lens will have a different depth of field on a Micro Four Thirds, APS-C or full frame sensor. This is important if you want to create stunning bokeh in your image.

This is also related to the "crop factor" of the sensor. AT digital photography The sensor size is compared to a full frame 35mm sensor in order to produce a "crop factor" that affects how the image will turn out. Imagine a whole sheet of paper with an image printed on it. Now imagine that someone cuts off the outer edges of the picture. As a result, the picture is smaller than the original, but it gives the impression that the view is enlarged. This is only due to the fact that you see a smaller area of ​​the entire image. You can read more about the differences between full-frame and cropped sensors in the following links: Choosing a format for shooting wildlife and sports - a DX or FX sensor? Full frame sensor: advantages and disadvantages

crop factor increases the effective focal length of the lens. For an APS-C sensor, this is 1.5x, and for Micro Four Thirds it is 2x. That is, if you have a 25mm lens on a Micro Thirds Four camera, it will show the same field of view as a 50mm lens on a full frame or 35mm film camera. 100mm is equivalent to 200mm.

In addition, it is advisable to give preference to lenses of the same brand as your camera. If you shoot with a Panasonic camera, you will benefit more from Panasonic optics. Olympus cameras have image stabilization built into the body, but there is no stabilization in the lenses. And Panasonic builds it into lenses, not cameras. Therefore, if you have a Panasonic camera and you mount Olympus lenses on it, you will not get image stabilization. Also, as a rule, Panasonic lenses come with a lens hood, but Olympus does not. The factor is not decisive, but, of course, this is a nice bonus.

Big zoom lens at a small price

Zoom lens Olympus M. 40-150mm F4.0-5.6 R
This zoom outperforms its price by a wide margin. It lacks extra features like optical image stabilization, but it does nice photos. It's on Amazon for just $150.

The first lens you will feel the need for is a good long zoom. If you're new to the world of interchangeable lens cameras, you'll be nostalgic for the zoom on your camera. Fortunately, Olympus creates a good and the highest degree affordable zoom lens. The Olympus M.Zuiko 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 can be bought for less than $200. It is suitable for any situation in which you want to shoot a distant object, and will be a great companion for travelers. Thus, you can shoot wild animals and birds, sights that are far away, and it is also suitable for shooting at a sporting event to catch the action on the field.

However, if you are shooting with a Panasonic body, then we recommend another lens - Panasonic 45-150mm F4.0-5.6. This is almost the same quality of optics, but a little more expensive. It has built-in image stabilization, which is a must when shooting long zooms on a Panasonic body. The Panasonic H-FS45150S Lumix G-Series Stabilized Zoom can be purchased on Amazon for $200.

The 40-150mm lens is great for new users for a number of reasons. It expands your shooting possibilities as its focal length range borders on that of the 14-42mm lens in the kit. And at under $200, we have an absolutely incredible deal. This is exactly the case when the lens takes very good images at a surprisingly low price.

The most discerning lens reviewers on Photozone said it was " good entry-level telephoto zoom lens". They praised its image quality when zoomed out, but it drops off at full 150mm coverage (a common complaint with low-budget zoom lenses). They also say that lens image distortion is taken care of by the camera's auto-correction and that " usually you don't have to worry about vignetting".

Photozone also commends it for its good mechanical construction, even though it's made entirely of plastic. "The workmanship is really good.", - reports the resource. Also in the review on PhotographyBlog, the lens is described as "A tiny, lightweight and attractively priced telephoto lens that delivers much better optical performance than other all-plastic equivalents at the same price Reviewers also praised it for good sharpness and excellent handling of aberrations and distortion.

Well said by the reviewers at SLRGear when they put it: "The Olympus 40-150mm ƒ/4-5.6 M.Zuiko performed well in our tests, offering excellent performance down to 100mm and above average performance at 150mm. PEN system users looking for a portable telephoto option to complement the 14-42mm lens from the kit, they can not look for anything else".

So it's a great lens up to 100mm and not bad beyond 100mm. It lacks stabilization, which can be a problem with some Panasonic cameras that also lack it, but it's an incredibly good and affordable lens.

At the end of January 2013 the company Tamron announced its first zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds: 14-150mm F/3.5-5.8 Di III VC. It will put out a little more light than the Olympus, it has a built-in image stabilizer and it has a stopper motor that allows it to focus more smoothly. Unfortunately, the manufacturer has not yet announced anything about the release date of this lens or its price, so we can not say anything more about it.

Photo: Ferdz Decena on Flickr

There are sample images here of what kind of magnification you can expect with an Olympus 40-150mm lens.

Affordable lens for maximum zoom

Interchangeable lens for Micro Four Thirds cameras Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm f/4-5.6 ASPH OIS. Its price on Amazon is $500.
it affordable option for maximum zoom if you need it.

We recommend the Panasonic Lumix 100-300mm f/4.0-5.6 G if you want an even longer zoom. If you're buying the first alternative lens, you'll be left with a nasty focal length gap since your kit lens covers 42mm-100mm. But the 100-300mm will give you a huge amount of extra reach and it has built in stabilization which is especially useful for owners of Panasonic cameras. The 35mm equivalent gives you a maximum focal length of 600mm, which is a really long zoom. In PhotoZone they talk about him" good, though not excellent They love its sharpness and lack of distortion, though they note that vignetting and color issues are present. Still, not bad for the $500 price tag.

Lenses with a fixed distance

The Micro Four Thirds family of lenses today is represented by a wide selection of fast lenses with a fixed distance. There are a lot of them and the vast majority take great photos, and they are surprisingly affordable. We invite you to consider some Micro Four Third fixes.

fast lens

Update: This lens has been discontinued, or rather, an updated version is being produced. However, the new version is optically identical, it just has a new metal case. Until someone thoroughly tests new version, we will not be able to say for sure what optical / mechanical changes have occurred in it. Therefore, for now, we will refrain from recommending it to you. You may prefer the option that is more affordable.

fast lens Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f/1.7

This lens has a wide f/1.7 aperture that lets in a lot of light, so it's versatile in a variety of shooting situations. Its effective focal length of 40mm makes it a great walking companion. It produces beautiful photographs for its relatively low price. On Amazon it costs $400.

We started by recommending the $400 Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f/1.7 ASPH, which has a large maximum aperture. This is one of the most popular lenses for Micro Four Thirds and it's pretty easy to see why. First, in 35mm equivalent it has 40mm, which means it's pretty close to the "normal" angle of view of the human eye. Secondly, this is a pancake, so your camera will remain compact. And with a maximum aperture of f/1.7, it throws out a huge amount of light, making it great for shooting when it starts to get dark.

Fast fixes, as a rule, one of the first lenses that can be recommended to beginners. They are also at the top of the list of recommended optics and for Canon cameras and Nikon. These lenses are absolutely fantastic. It may take you a little time to get used to the transition from a zoom lens to a prime lens, but the benefits of this are very great: both images and photographic skills will improve. After all, zooming with a lens is not the same as zooming with your own legs. Using fixed focal length optics, you will learn how to move your body to get the shot you really want.

The 20mm Panasonic is very well received in terms of image quality. DPReview awarded him " highly recommended" thanks to " impressive image quality at all apertures"and for" good build quality, correct manual focus ring and non-rotating front element It was one of the earliest Micro Four lenses and DPReview called it "the first must-have lens for Micro Four Thirds" back in 2009. It hasn't gotten any worse over time.

Photo: "the justified sinner" on Flickr

PhotoZone claims that while the lens is crisp in the center, it produces soft images in the corners, but overall called it " highly recommended". And Steve Huff says it's "a high quality lens that won't break the bank. You can shoot in low light, create shallow depth of field and get great results His link also has some pretty good shots taken with this lens. Pixel Peeper is another great resource for finding test shots.

In June 2013, 43Rumors reported that Panasonic Japan noted 20mm f/1.7 lens as out of production. But currently it is still available in most stores (Amazon, B&H, Adorama). This is a very popular lens, so you will be able to get it for a while. The replacement looks identical. Same optics, but a new coat of paint. What's not clear is whether the autofocus will be improved in the new version, as the old one sometimes behaves a bit sluggishly. But the press materials don't seem to mention it. The new version is already available for pre-order, but until we know more, we suggest just buying whichever lens is more affordable.

Alternative fast lens

Olympus M.Zuiko 17mm f1.8

Here we have slightly better autofocus, a slightly wider angle, a higher price tag and a thicker body. And it can be considered a good choice. The price on Amazon is $499.
Olympus 17mm f/1.8 is another popular pancake lens. Its slightly wider field of view has a howling audience. According to excellent reviews on Phoblographer, Olympus has best quality assembly and autofocus, but the Panasonic is sharper. However, the Olympus is $150 more expensive and a bit bulkier, so we recommend the Panasonic if you're looking to save some money.

A fast lens with a fixed distance - a budget option

Lens Sigma 19mm f2.8DN(Micro Four Thirds) priced at $199 on Amazon.

It is larger, transmits less light, but is still optically excellent and very affordable.

If you want an option for a more affordable yet still optically great lens, we recommend the recently released Sigma 19mm f/2.8 which will set you back as low as $200. e. This lens is available for Micro Four Thirds and Sony NEX series cameras. Mike Pouliot on Phoblographer called him "reliable choice"for a newcomer to Micro Four Thirds, and also stated that " image quality is very good and build quality is better than some of the more expensive lenses in this format". However, it lets in less light and is slower to focus than our top pick.

Very sharp but expensive wide-angle fast lens

Lens Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0 Sells on Amazon for $799. But he fully justifies himself.

A very sharp, albeit expensive, fast lens that's well worth the cash you'll spend on it if you're serious about image quality.

If you're willing to pay more, there are two really great options that we recommend checking out. The much more expensive Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 12mm f/2.0, which is over $800. Its distance is shorter than 20mm, the price is much higher, and the maximum aperture is smaller - so why do you need it? Because the quality of the image that it creates is fully consistent with its price.

According to reviews: This is an incredibly sharp lens with excellent optical performance. A focal length of 12mm is equivalent to 24mm, which is considered an excellent field of view for street photography. Plus, recommendations from photographers like Steve Huff and Michael Reichman will certainly help. It is wide enough for shooting indoors, especially in slightly cramped conditions such as parties.

Panasonic Lumix G Micro 4/3 LEICA DG SUMMILUX 25mm f/1.4 Leica Aspherical Lens

Another upscale fast wide-angle- Panasonic 25 mm f/1.4, available from Amazon for $570. Many photographers, including Steve Huff, are very approving of this model. It is appreciated for its focusing speed and beautiful bokeh. CameraLabs praises the sharpness as well as the contrast and calls it "the standard excellent quality lens for the Micro Four Thirds system". The 50mm equivalent focal length is more flexible than Olympus's 24mm and works well for shooting all sorts of subjects, especially people.

macro lens

Olympus MSC ED M. 60 mm f/2.8

Macro photography allows you to see the world from a whole new perspective. You can buy it on Amazon for $500. And it's not so much to become the owner of such a well-proven lens.

Fortunately, choosing a macro lens for Micro Four Thirds is very easy. There are only two options and one of them is much cheaper than the other. Not so long ago, the Olympus M.Zuiko 60mm f/2.8 ED macro lens was released, which can be yours for $500. It was announced in mid-September, so we don't have many reviews about it. However, on blogs and forums, the owners characterize it extremely positively. Users liked it and you can see excellent examples of pictures taken with this lens. It's also significantly cheaper than another Micro Four Thirds macro lens (Panasonic Leica DG Macro-Elmarit 45mm f/2.8 ASPH OIS) and has a longer focal length so you don't have to get as close to your subject.

Photo: "danska8" on Flickr

Macros often defined by the magnification factor. Briefly, this lens is capable of 1:1 zoom at a distance of 19 cm. This means that if the object is 19 cm from the lens, and you photograph an insect 1 cm long, then it will take 1 cm on the camera sensor. This is a lot and should contain a lot of details.

Macro photography is one of the most interesting areas of photography. You do not need to persuade friends to pose for you and create a big studio. All you need is a macro lens (and preferably a tripod). Pretty much anything shot in macro instantly becomes intriguing. Super close-ups of plants and insects are standard images, but food, metal objects, or anything with tiny details becomes infinitely more interesting under a macro lens. Take a picture of a coin, a bug, lines in the palm of your hand. Just experiment.

portrait lens

Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8 for photographing people.

An effective 90mm focal length and a wide f/1.8 aperture make it great for capturing people without having to get too close. It costs $400 on Amazon.

On the other hand, if you enjoy photographing friends, how about a portrait lens? True, it does not have the most convenient focal length if you are not used to it. You can use it for more than just portrait work, but it's not always easy. If you are planning to photograph your friends and family, then consider purchasing the 45mm f/1.8 Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED. This is an excellent fast lens, giving a 90mm equivalent focal length close to the standard for portrait photography.

At 90mm, you can feel some difficulty if you're used to shooting with a 35mm or 50mm lens. But here the advantage is that you can get nice shot his subject unnecessarily is very close. And the longer the focal length, the better the faces of the people being photographed look, as you can see for yourself.

Photo: David Leather on Flickr

45mm has excellent optical properties, which is typical for many Micro Four Thirds prime lenses. ePhotoZine praised him for " excellent performance for a wide aperture lens"; also dubbed as " highly desirable", and the quality as "very high" at f/4. PhotographyBlog recommends this lens, while SLRGear writes: " excellent test results, this is clearly a great and inexpensive addition to your Olympus PEN kit, especially if you are a portrait photographer".

You can take a look at the photos that Robin Wong took with this lens in two parts of his review. Whether in the studio or outdoors, you can capture really good portraits of people with a 45mm lens.

Expensive portrait lens

Olympus M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 75mm f1.8.

If you're truly into portrait photography, there's an excellent lens with an unusual focal length that you should look into. It's a 75mm f/1.8 Olympus and can be had for about $900. Its equivalent focal length is 150mm, which is not typical for a portrait lens, but it is highly acclaimed as one of the best available. PhotoZone says it's " quite cost-effective and best lens Micro Four Thirds, which we have tested to date." In addition, SLRGear noted that it is " one of the sharpest lenses we've ever tested". If portrait photography is your specialty and your budget allows, then consider becoming its owner.

Portrait lens - alternative

At the beginning of May 2013, the company Sigma announced the release 60mm f/2.8 macro lens for Micro Four Thirds and Sony E Mount, which will debut for just $239. It has the same focal length as the Olympus M.ZUIKO 60mm f/2.8 ED we mentioned earlier (120mm equivalent), but this product cannot be called a true macro lens as there is no mention of its scale. However, it has the potential to be a good alternative as a portrait lens. The length of 120 mm for a traditional portrait is still acceptable. Yes, and the price tag is 239 USD. adds to its attractiveness. And we hope this lens lives up to Sigma's reputation for excellent optics.

Pancake lens: wide angle, narrow body

Panasonic Lumix 14mm f/2.5G ASPH

The compact size of this lens makes it great for touring. Its short focal length allows you to better capture wider scenes and landscapes. It costs $265 on Amazon.

It's kind of a weird category. We've already recommended one pancake lens: the 20mm f/1.7. But the fact is that there are several other options that can also be considered, and they are so small that for the sake of their compactness it is worth mentioning them. When the lens is one or two centimeters thick, it will not take up much space and you will not need a special bag to carry it.

Pancakes are the smallest and have gained a reputation for excellent optics. The great thing about them is that you get great photos without much bulk or weight, meaning the system camera is portable and you can put it in your pocket. Thus, you are spared the need to carry around a large bag of equipment. Also, if you keep your camera around your neck all day, your body will definitely feel relieved if you use a pancake lens.

One of these lenses is Panasonic Lumix 14mm f/2.5G. It sells for around $285 and has a similar focal length to the Olympus 12mm f/2 we recommended above. However, this option is much smaller and much cheaper. The 14mm is a great lens for street photography. Your camera will be thin and light, take great photos and fit in your pocket.

The 14mm lens has a maximum aperture of f/2.5, which means it's smaller, so it's not as good for low-light shooting as the 20mm, which also has a wider field of view. Steve Huff liked this lens. PhotographyBlog gave it a rating of 4.5 out of 5. The very demanding experts from PhotoZone said that " resolution is very good, but not stellar"and SLRGear came to the conclusion that he gives " clear results and has little problems with CA. Overall, Panasonic has released a very good 14mm ƒ/2.5G travel lens.".
Since it is small and light, it will not burden you if you walk around with it all day. You can check out the link on Flickr for interesting footage shot with this lens.

Roger Cicala also recommends two fast lenses Sigma: 30mm f/2.8 and 19mm f/2.8. They both cost about $200 each. He says: " Their image quality is excellent and the price is amazing".

Ultra thin lens

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital BCL-15mm f8.0

This fixed aperture, fixed focal length lens looks more like a lens cap, but it's a real lens that can produce some interesting results with a bit of a retro flair. In addition, this miracle of optics can be bought on Amazon for only $50!

Oddly enough, but last but not least, we recommend that you also consider this lens, which surprises with its price and capabilities. The quirky Olympus BCL-15mm F/8 looks like a lens cap. It costs only 50 USD. It has a fixed focal length which is 30mm in 35mm equivalent. And the fixed aperture is F/8. But it is literally the smallest lens on the market. Examples of images taken with this lens can be viewed , and . It's an unbearably limited lens, but it will amuse you and make you think more about your photos.

Photo: Beega Tan on Flickr

If keeping the kit as compact as possible is of the utmost importance to you, then you won't find a smaller option than this one. Of course, with a fixed aperture of f/8 you can feel the limitations, but you can do something. You can focus to the hyperfocal distance (small orange mark after the infinity sign). Then nothing more than something about three meters away won't be the focus, so it's great for candid shots.

A few words about other lenses

In this review, we only talked about Olympus lenses and Panasonic, but there's a whole world of other lenses out there for owners of Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras. The design of these cameras allows you to use models from other manufacturers through adapters.

For example, Noktor lenses have the widest maximum aperture imaginable. You can pick up adapters for Olympus Four Thirds lenses (those for Olympus SLR cameras), for old Olympus OM lenses, for Leica M, Leica R, Voigtlander VM, Carl Zeiss ZM, Voigtlander Ai-S, Carl Zeiss lenses ZF, Voigtlander PK-A/R, KA and Carl Zeiss ZK.

The world of Micro Four Thirds lenses is arguably the most exciting in modern photography. Olympus and Panasonic have managed to create a small but excellent catalog of lenses.

Summarizing

For users who have just become owners of cameras with interchangeable lenses in Micro Four Thirds format, we recommend that you first of all get an Olympus M.ZUIKO 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 lens. And then look at a set of fast prime lenses: the Panasonic LUMIX G 20mm f/1.7 pancake lens, the Olympus M.Zuiko 60mm f/2.8 ED macro lens, the Olympus M. Zuiko Digital ED 45mm f/1.8 portrait lens, the Panasonic Lumix 14mm f/2.5 G as well as the Olympus BCL-15mm f8.0. If you buy all of the recommended lenses on this list, you'll spend $1,800 and get six interesting lenses, all of which produce quality images.