The income of the head of RUSNANO, Anatoly Chubais, grew by 23% over the year and amounted to 260.1 million rubles in 2011. He received the main part of his income by selling part of the land plot in the Tver region.
In 2010, the head of RUSNANO earned about 212 million rubles, and in 2009 - 202.7 million rubles. Moreover, Chubais received 135.6 million rubles from the sale of this land plot. In addition, 91.8 million rubles brought him securities and shares in commercial organizations.
Chubais's income as the head of RUSNANO amounted to 22.4 million rubles, from deposits in banks and other credit institutions he received 10.3 million rubles. It is noted that Chubais sent 10.2 million rubles from personal funds to charity.
The head of RUSNANO owns an apartment in the capital with a total area of 175.8 square meters, and also has a land plot in the Moscow region with a total area of 55.5 thousand square meters. This area is included in authorized capital LLC "Development Capital" Besides, Chubais owns a BMW X5, a snowmobile and a trailer.
Of the members of the board of RUSNANO, in addition to Chubais, in 2011, Yury Udaltsov, Director for Innovative Development of RUSNANO, had the most income. In 2011, his personal income amounted to 100.2 million rubles, of which he received 11.5 million rubles as a salary from RUSNANO, RIA Novosti reports.
Also, employees of the Federal Service security (FSB), the Federal Security Service (FSO), the state corporation "Rosatom" and the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR). For example, the general director of Rosatom, Sergei Kiriyenko, earned 41.8 million rubles in 2011, having increased his income by 2.3 times over the year. His wife increased her wealth by 32 times - in 2011 her income amounted to 11.39 million rubles, in 2010 - 357 thousand rubles.
Director of the FSB Alexander Bortnikov earned in 2011 as much as in 2010 - 4.6 million rubles. He owns an apartment, a garage and two parking spaces. His wife earned 150 thousand rubles, while she owns a land plot, residential building and an apartment.
Sergey Buravlev became the richest of the deputy directors of the FSB. His income amounted to 5.6 million rubles. He also has three land, a house and two apartments - one of them is in common ownership with his wife.
Head of the Federal Security Service (FSO) Yevgeny Murov earned 5.7 million rubles in 2011. Of the vehicles, he indicated a rare Moskvich 401, a Harley Davidson motorcycle, Honda and Suzuki scooters, and a Polaris all-terrain vehicle. The director of the FSO has two wooden houses, an apartment and a brick garage.
The head of the Foreign Intelligence Service, Mikhail Fradkov, became impoverished in a year. In 2011, he earned 5.2 million rubles, which is 1.9 million less than in 2010. He has an apartment, a land plot, a cottage and a parking space. His deputy Dmitry Faddeev turned out to be richer. His income amounted to seven million rubles. He also owns an apartment, two land plots, an "unfinished dacha building", a parking space and Audi A6 and BMW 318 cars, Kommersant writes.
According to various estimates, Russian millionaires own a fortune that is estimated at 73.5% of the country's GDP. The top richest people in Russia include not only oligarchs, but also the top of state-owned companies. "Interlocutor" calculated what the approximate salaries of the richest people in Russia are.
At the same time, experts immediately explained that the amount of remuneration received was significantly underestimated. Companies and banks do not disclose how many bonuses were paid to a particular manager. In official reports, only the total value is present. State managers refuse to disclose information about their property, so analysts rely only on averages. Nevertheless, the amounts are still huge.
1. Anatoly Chubais, receives approximately 1,620,000,000 rubles a year.
Anatoly Chubais sits on the board of directors of JSC Rusnano (income 1,000,000 rubles a year), is a member of the board of directors of PJSC Pipe Metallurgical Company (another 11,000,000) and, most importantly, chairs LLC Management Company Rosnano (1 050,000,000 rubles). In addition, he cooperates with Skolkovo, heads NovaMedica LLC and RosnanoMedInvest LLC. Chubais's annual income would be enough for 80,000 Russian pensioners.
2. Alexey Miller. The annual salary is not less than 699,000,000 rubles.
Alexey Miller, head of PJSC Gazprom, is also the chairman of the board of directors at Gazprombank, SOGAZ, Gazprom Neft, and Gazprom Media. According to analysts, Miller's monthly salary is more than 58,000,000 rubles. This is a thousand times more than most employees of Gazprom.
3. German Gref. The annual salary is not less than 519,000,000 rubles.
As it turned out, German Gref earns more at Sberbank than Andrey Kostin at VTB. The state evaluates Gref's talents higher than the entire Russian hockey team. For the victory at the Olympics, 100 million "prize" rubles were allocated for the entire team. And one Gref - half a billion.
4. Igor Sechin - the salary for the year is at least 361,000,000 rubles.
In 2017, 11 members of the Rosneft Management Board received a reward of 3,895,000,000 rubles. On average, each comes out at 354,000,000 per year. It is logical to assume that the chairman of the board, Igor Sechin, got more, but exactly how much is a secret, despite the recent recommendations of the Central Bank to indicate earnings by name.
5. Sergey Chemezov. The annual salary is not less than 212,000,000 rubles.
The salary of another top manager, CEO of Rostec Sergey Chemezov, is 400 times higher than the average for the state corporation (44,000 per month). He controls an entire empire. In total, 453 thousand people work in the structures of the corporation.
6. Boris Kovalchuk. The annual salary is not less than 178,000,000 rubles.
Chairman of the Board of Inter RAO UES Boris Kovalchuk earns 21 times more than the head of government.
7. Oleg Belozerov - approximately 173,000,000 rubles a year.
The only one among the top managers of state-owned companies who is not afraid to officially declare income is the head of Russian Railways, Oleg Belozerov. He boldly indicates that for his work he has an income of more than 14,000,000 rubles a month.
8. Andrey Kostin. The annual salary is not less than 122,000,000 rubles.
14/03/2018
How much top managers of state-owned companies earn has been speculated many times. But if about real numbers one can only guess, since companies tend to hide unofficial rewards, even the amounts that the media can find out about are impressive. Especially in relative terms. From them, for example, it becomes clear that Chubais costs the state much more than the head of Gazprom, Alexei Miller.
The order of amounts that top managers in state-owned companies receive can only be guessed from open data. For example, in Rosneft, 11 members of the board last year received 3 billion 895 million rubles as remuneration. That is, on average, this is 354 million rubles a year for each. But it is logical to assume that Igor Sechin receives the most.
“But exactly how much is a secret. Despite the recent recommendations of the Central Bank to indicate earnings by name, ”the Sobesednik notes in its material.
In addition to the main place of work, many top managers also have “spare” sources of income. For example, the head of PJSC Gazprom, Alexei Miller, is also the chairman of the board of directors at Gazprombank, SOGAZ, Gazprom Neft, and Gazprom Media.
For example, in neighboring Lithuania, Saulius Bilis, CEO of the natural gas transmission system operator Amber Grid, receives 9,639 euros per month. 86 times less than his Russian counterpart Alexei Miller. But among leaders state enterprises in the post-Soviet republic, this is the largest income.
According to Sobesednik's calculations, Miller's monthly salary is more than 58 million rubles. This is a thousand times more than most employees of Gazprom.
Anatoly Chubais also does not concentrate only in Rosnano, where he receives 1 million rubles a year. He also sits on the board of directors of PJSC Pipe Metallurgical Company (another 11 million rubles) and, most importantly, presides over Rosnano Management Company LLC (41 million rubles). In addition, he cooperates with Skolkovo, heads NovaMedica LLC and RosnanoMedInvest LLC.
“Chubais promised to lead Rosnano until his retirement. His annual income would be enough for 60,000 Russian pensioners,” the newspaper says ironically.
"National unloved" - this is how you can call one of the most famous and controversial Russian politicians, Anatoly Chubais. According to the results of a VTsIOM opinion poll in 2006, 77% of Russians did not trust Chubais. In a 2000 FOM poll, Russians described Chubais as "a person acting to the detriment of Russia" and a "discrediter of reforms". However, the dislike of ordinary citizens did not prevent him from creating and increasing his fortune. In 2015 alone, Anatoly Chubais earned over 1 billion rubles, according to Forbes. What assets are owned and managed by the chief power engineer and nanomanager of the country - in the material of "FederalPress".
personal fortune
It is not possible to find out from official sources exactly how Chubais multiplied his fortune last year. The last time the head of Rosnano publicly disclosed his income was in 2014, when he declared 207 million rubles, including 13.6 million rubles received at his main place of work.
But in 2015, Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev changed the procedure for disclosing income by the heads of state-owned companies. Now the heads of only those state-owned companies and corporations that are 100% owned by the state are required to report publicly. The resulting legal loophole was immediately taken advantage of - Rosnano announced that Anatoly Chubais was leaving his post CEO company, becoming the chairman of the board of directors of LLC Management Company Rosnano, which is 99% state-owned. The remaining percentage, oddly enough, is owned directly by Chubais.
According to Rosnano itself, in 2015 the company became profitable for the second year in a row - however, the net profit was the result not of an increase in turnover or the supply of services, but of the sale of assets. So, against the background of revenue for 2015 of 7.2 billion rubles (an increase of 6% compared to the level of 2014), the net profit of the Group doubled and amounted to 16.82 billion rubles.
According to RBC, Anatoly Chubais explained that such indicators were achieved due to an increase in the value of Rosnano's assets by 18.6% (up to 227.7 billion rubles) and an increase in the assessment of the investment portfolio by 23% (up to 138 billion rubles). At the same time, directly from the sale of part of its assets, Rosnano received 3.7 billion rubles in 2015 against 2.6 billion rubles a year earlier. " This does not mean that we will continue to receive 17 billion rubles every year - there is a difficult situation ahead", Chubais emphasized.
Private property
However, the fact that information about Chubais's salary is closed is not decisive - according to Forbes, the main place of work is not at all the main source of his income. Moreover, almost everything that he earns at Rosnano, he spends on charity. According to the website of the state corporation, in 2010-2014 he received 102 million rubles for his work, of which 81 million rubles he donated to good causes.
According to Forbes, in 2015, Chubais's main income came from securities transactions. He received more than 1 billion rubles from the sale of the property of the Perspective Companies mutual investment fund, which was closed at the end of 2015. Other shareholders of the fund were his friend and co-founder of the fund, Boris Mints, as well as the Telecom-Soyuz pension fund owned by the latter. " When the mutual fund was closed, the shareholders were distributed income, which I declared and paid all taxes on them", - said Chubais.
In general, according to the magazine, in 2010-2014, Chubais's official income, which consisted of earnings in Rosnano and income from the sale of 1.1% financial corporation"Opening", amounted to 1.1 billion rubles.
Family assets
If we do not take into account changes in corporate reporting legislation, Chubais could still be considered the head of the state corporation with the largest income. “Number two” among the heads of state corporations is the head of Rostec Sergey Chemezov, who earned 168 million rubles (his wife - 117 million rubles). In third place is the head of Rosatom, Sergei Kiriyenko, with an annual income of 134 million rubles.
Unlike Mr. Chemezov, Anatoly Chubais is not inclined to rewrite his property in the name of his wife or to joint business. However, the income level of the “second halves” of the ex-official can be considered comparable.
According to the media, the first wife of the power engineer, Lyudmila, after a divorce in the early 2000s, opened an institution of Russian cuisine in St. Petersburg called Mechta Molokhovets (Elena Molokhovets is the author of a book on housekeeping, published in 1861). This restaurant was founded by the first wife of Anatoly Borisovich on shares with a friend of her son, taking a loan from a bank. She denied in every possible way that her ex-husband provided her with any help in business.
In a marriage with Lyudmila, Anatoly Chubais had two children - daughter Olga and son Anatoly. Both received an economic education, but if almost nothing is known about Olga's activities, then Anatoly seems to have decided to follow in his father's footsteps.
In 2012, he is on a par with an athlete Larisa Selezneva(50% stakes in the authorized capital of 10 thousand rubles each) created Avtomaniya LLC. The registration data of the legal entity indicates that its main activity is the organization of recreation and entertainment. In turn, Larisa Selezneva explained to Izvestia that the company would organize corporate events, technical support road trips and test drives. She also noted that the partners were not going to attract additional investment. " This market does not require big investments. We live on prepayment. We usually require 80% down payment", Selezneva told reporters.
The second wife of Chubais, Maria Vishnevskaya, was his colleague at the Leningrad Engineering and Economic Institute: Anatoly Borisovich was an associate professor, and Maria Davydovna was a senior researcher. In this marriage, judging by the data declared for 2009, Chubais did not deprive his wife financially (her income amounted to 22 million rubles), but his level of solvency was many times higher - more than 202 million rubles (this amount includes salary in the then " Rosnanotech", profit from securities and deposits in banks, shares from participation in commercial organizations).
The most famous can be called the third wife of the manager - Avdotya Smirnova, screenwriter, director and host of the School of Scandal program. After her marriage to Chubais in 2012, her fortune, according to her husband's declaration of income, increased 12 times: from 441 thousand rubles to 5.2 million rubles. The TV presenter owns two apartments in Russia with an area of 124.2 and 95.3 square meters, as well as half an apartment in Portugal with an area of 85.78 square meters.
The house that was built by... Chubais?
Nevertheless, despite the square meters indicated in the declaration for 2013, most likely, they are far from the only ones. According to the same Forbes, information about a house under construction in the suburban village of Peredelki got into the public plane. The legal owner of the land with an area of 15.563 thousand square meters and the house with an area of 2.657 thousand square meters is the Swiss SFO Concept AG. However, Forbes sources claim that the house was built for Anatoly Chubais and his wife Avdotya Smirnova.
The real estate is now owned by the SFO Concept company, which since 2010 has been headed by Ilya Suchkov, the brother of Igor Suchkov, who was an adviser to Chubais for 17 years, and the son of Vasily Suchkov, who worked with the current head of Rosnano in the State Property Committee, writes Forbes.
According to a source close to one of the creditors, SFO Concept managed Chubais's assets for a long time, but in 2013, when a law was passed banning officials from owning foreign assets, Chubais sold the company to Suchkov.
Chubais confirmed to Forbes that he previously owned the SFO Concept. According to him, in 2013 he sold it to "another person, so that it would organize the construction of the house and raise funds." " In the future, the house was to become my property. As far as I know, the company violated a number of commercial agreements in terms of attracted financing, and, apparently, this was the reason for filing claims against it from creditors", - said the head of "Rosnano" edition.
According to preliminary estimates, the cost of the house now arrested by a court decision is from 40 to 50 million dollars.
Photo: FederalPress / Victor Vytolsky
Opponents of Anatoly Chubais rub their hands. The Accounts Chamber has completed the audit of the state corporation Rosnano and, according to the schedule, will publish its results by the end of April, according to the schedule. It is already clear that the enemies of the father of Russian privatization will have something to profit from. “A big audit, a colossal amount of funds, a colossal amount of work ... The volume of violations is significant, to put it mildly,” commented Sergei Agaptsov, auditor of the Accounts Chamber, on the audit.
Without waiting for other sensations from the auditors, the Chubais Corporation itself recently announced that the planned losses from unsuccessful projects last year would amount to 21.8 billion rubles, trying to explain that this, in general, is not so much - 16.4% of total investment. Only the public cannot be reassured by interest. After all, billions were wasted against the background of very decent average salaries of Rosnano managers - 400,000 rubles a month.
Not to mention the monthly salary of Chubais himself in the amount of 2 million rubles. How can you pay so much for obvious failures?
Having gathered all the power of the hindsight into a fist, it is really easy to criticize the deeds of Rosnano. Was it really not immediately clear that Plastic Logic, which develops flexible tablets, should remain purely research and technological, and not try to start mass production? After all, competing with Apple, Samsung or LG in this area is a dead number. It seems to have been clear from the very beginning, but 3 billion rubles were lost before they changed the strategy.
The largest amount - 9.4 billion rubles - had to be written off on a project with the Nitol group for the production of polycrystalline silicon for solar cells - for some reason they did not find out in time that similar plants were already being built in China, which means that the market prospects for the more expensive Russian there are no products. And in general, they overestimated the prospects for solar energy. Two more unpleasant write-offs: 2.5 billion rubles for the Lipetsk company for the production of cutting wire for silicon wafers Cutting Edge and 1.3 billion rubles for the Stavropol plant of Monocrystal sapphire wafers.
Despite the massive attack by the budget defenders, Chubais has a chance to fight back - not for the first time, and, besides, the loss of only every seventh ruble in such a risky business as investing in high technology is really not very much.
But paradoxically, it would be more useful for the development of high-tech in Russia if the state corporation Rosnano failed much more and as a result it would be seriously reformed, if not disbanded.
States that wanted and achieved technological breakthroughs acted according to other schemes.
When the Rosnano Corporation was just being created, the experts most inspired by the idea compared it to the Manhattan Project. In terms of scale and costs, Rosnano really looked like a deal between Roosevelt and the world's leading physicists. But there is a nuance that makes the comparison of Rosnano with Manhattan inadequate. Nor plans to establish in the US atomic bomb, neither the American lunar program, nor similar Soviet achievements were investment projects that had to be successfully invested in order to fight back no less successfully. It was a technological race as such, as an end in itself, for the achievement of which practically no means were spared. The main thing is to choose the right goal, and then everything will work out.
But then, after the implementation of the nuclear and space megaprojects, something completely wrong happened to the Soviet - and by inheritance Russian - goal-setting. The well-known Internet entrepreneur German Klimenko recently recalled that in the 1960s the USSR had an advantage over the United States in some computer developments, but for some reason relied on copying American systems and thereby, I apologize for the pun, programmed its lagging behind the United States in the field IT for decades. Well, now we are behind the West also in medicines, and even in large-diameter pipes.
Whatever technological goal the state sets, even cellular telephone to make your own, not to mention the launch of a spaceship to Phobos, nothing happens.
Rosnano - yes, in fact, Skolkovo - in this situation, they look like attempts to find another way to speed up technological development, even if those who see in both projects only a cut of budgetary funds are right (it's still a different way). But the problem is that profit and a technological breakthrough are different goals, and if a state corporation undertakes to solve both problems, then the situation is simply schizophrenic. On the one hand, the state corporation must save every budget penny, on the other hand, boldly and resolutely invest in the new and unknown. Remember what they wanted to do with Chubais when, having not found a sufficient number of attractive investment projects, he decided to temporarily hold Rosnano's money in a bank: misappropriation of funds! Not to mention the fact that it is just as undesirable for the state to engage in high-tech business as for any other: a market player who has the right to print money and collect taxes from other players never works efficiently himself, and makes everyone else uncompetitive.
Now Chubais, in order to reduce the loss of money of Rosnano, is preparing a new strategy: the corporation will work with entrepreneurs under the scheme of general and limited partnerships. Well, this will certainly prolong the existence of Rosnano and really increase the efficiency of its work. But do not expect technological revolutions. To do this, the state must regain the ability to competently formulate, I apologize for the bureaucracy, the priorities of scientific and technological policy. Understand what technology he needs and achieve its creation without thinking about the return of funds. Instead of calculating, together with auditors, the internal profitability of projects that have long existed even in China.
For beginners: breeding a broiler at home Boiled water for broilers
Only lovers will survive
Features of advertising aimed at children
retouching old photos in photoshop retouching old photos
What is an NPO: decoding, definition of goals, types of activities Does a non-profit organization have the right