A man has died. They entered into an inheritance. There is a dacha, privatized (the person was in the snt). Will sell until we find a buyer. As long as the person was alive, All dues were paid regularly. After death, we had no time to take care of the dacha. Now debt...
400
price
question
issue resolved
Is it legal for another SNT to charge me membership fees for plumbing maintenance in the winter?
Hello! My garden plot is located on the border of two SNTs. I am a member of one SNT, and the water was supplied from another (with their permission, paying the amount for the tie-in). the pipeline was laid next to my site (200 meters to my SNT pipe). Then they ...
03 December 2017, 23:28, question #1833362 Alexander, Rostov-on-Don
What contributions to the SNT need to be paid if the house is not a country house, but a residential one?
Good evening. I would like to know if I own a residential building with a residence permit in SNT, what fees am I required to pay (I did not join SNT)?
Registration of the right to a centralized winter water supply in SNT
Winter water on the territory of SNT. There is a well through which the summer water supply is officially connected .. to the centralized city water supply. There is a decision of the general meeting of gardeners to build a winter water supply. 20 gardeners have...
October 18, 2017, 07:24, question #1783818 Vladislav, Novosibirsk
289
price
question
issue resolved
How to prove the inaction of the chairman of the SNT?
Hello. In May 2016, at the general meeting of the SNT, they decided to connect to the city water canal (before that, water was provided by a nearby plant), for this they determined a target contribution of 5,000 from the site (a total of 170 accounts in the partnership). During the year...
At what distance from the land plot should SNT garbage cans be located?
My house is in SNT. How far from my land should the garbage cans be located?
June 26, 2017, 13:32, question #1678613 Vazhnichiy Vladimir Viktorovich, Agoy
Collection of debts from a member of SNT for non-payment of debts for the use of summer water supply, which is not on the site
SNT filed a lawsuit against me because I used summer water supply and did not pay money for water. One could agree, but! : 1. There is no pipeline at my site (it has been gone for five years already). 2. We have not been planting since 2005...
01 April 2017, 15:11, question #1593257
How to prove in court that debts for water to SNT are unreasonable, since pipes were stolen 5 years ago?
SNT sued me for debts on membership fees, as well as for water in the summer water supply and security of the site. How can I prove in court that my suburban area there has been no running water for about five years, because the pipes were stolen. Also for security...
01 April 2017, 05:48, question #1592903 Olga, Komsomolsk-on-Amur
Are SNTs required to purchase a motor pump if it is part of an urban area?
Hello! My question concerns the fact that our SNT is obliged to purchase a motor pump in accordance with paragraph 31 of the Technical Regulations on the requirements fire safety» Art. 4 p. 4, PPB 01-03. However, our SNT is part of an urban area. My...
389
price
question
issue resolved
Who should repair the water supply of the suburban area
Hello! I am a member of SNT "Cheryomushki" in Novosibirsk. The central water conduit runs along the neighbor's fence, located, on the contrary, through the carriageway of a dirt road, 5 m wide. My connection to the water conduit is made in a superficial way on ...
May 15, 2016, 19:33, question #1252593 Andrey Aliferenko, Novosibirsk
300
price
question
issue resolved
The chairman of the SNT demands an entrance fee, refusing to accept membership and earmarked contributions
Hello. I own a house and a plot in snt since March 2015, the house is fully equipped, call in and live. SNT has been founded since 1992. In my hands I have a gardener's membership book from the previous owner since 1992, where all contributions, debts are registered ...
03 October 2015, 20:17, question #995142 Julia, St. Petersburg
The FEDKOR company does not operate in the real estate market, but at the same time it is able to increase the liquidity of developers' assets in the Moscow region. Pine lovers, fresh air and pre-dawn fishing will be more willing to consider proposals for purchasing a house in a cottage village, if the developer takes care of bringing communications to it, in particular, a water supply system.
The water supply system of cottage settlements has a simple scheme: the source is a well, a facility for preparing and storing water, pumping station for its supply to the "central" pipeline, branches to each residential building. Linking all these technological facilities into one scheme, selecting equipment and carrying out its installation is the task of FEDCOR.
Water supply of the village without a water tower
What well will provide water supply to a holiday village without a water tower?
The answer is on the surface: with high performance that will last for decades. To understand the water abundance of the source, geological exploration is carried out, for this it is necessary to obtain a license to study the subsoil.
As a result of geological research and exploratory drilling, deposits are identified, the exploitation of which ensures uninterrupted water supply to the village. The extracted water is subject to analysis to find out whether its properties - physico-chemical and organoleptic - comply with sanitary standards.
The extraction of water from a water-saturated horizon, and this will be limestone, is also carried out on the basis of a license, but already for the use of subsoil. The depth of the well, as a rule, is greater than that of a similar hydraulic structure drilled for an individual user. The diameter of the casing pipes, which is logical, too. The column outside must withstand significant pressure from the rocks that make up the section, and inside it must be spacious enough so that a submersible pump is located in it, not close to the walls. The pump in the well is the station of the first rise, from which the water supply of the village begins.
Schematic diagram of the VZU
The water supply of the cottage village from the well should provide water supply to all consumers, taking into account peak consumption. Let's say, in the summer on hot days, during irrigation or on weekdays from 18 to 21. The task of the designers is to create such a system that at any time there would be enough water for everyone without losing its pressure.
From the well, water is supplied to the reservoirs. Their ground, underground placement is allowed, as well as inside buildings. Due to the filling of these volumetric tanks (buffer tank), the village is actually supplied with water without a water tower. As soon as there is consumption, it turns on pump equipment and losses are replenished from the accumulated water in the tanks. The ground pumping station (second lift) must supply the working medium from the storage tanks with drinking characteristics to the central pipeline.
In order for the water supply of cottage settlements not to cause complaints from residents, good pressure is not enough. Among the complex of ground equipment, an important place is occupied by a water treatment plant. The purification system is selected based on laboratory analysis and includes a set of equipment that allows you to remove iron from water, eliminate the smell of hydrogen sulfide, reduce water hardness, and make water transparent and tasty.
The VZU building is being erected to accommodate equipment, its operational management, and monitoring of operating modes.
Water supply project for a cottage village
In order for water to be extracted, processed, supplied to the networks, communications were brought to each house, a water supply project for the village is being drawn up. The project is drawn up taking into account hydrogeological features, terrain, location of plots and houses, requirements for the volume and quality of water. The scheme for laying communications involves laying the central pipeline and outlets to the consumer below the level of soil freezing. In the Moscow region, this mark is approximately 2 meters.
The water supply system in the cottage village is carried out by laying the main line from the VZU to the property, with the installation of distribution wells in the immediate vicinity of the site. An outlet tap to the consumer in the well is made with the mandatory installation of a water metering unit and a shut-off valve.
FEDCOR - one executor for creating all engineering solutions.
The company "FEDKOR" specializes in the creation of engineering communications. We especially note that we carry out all the types of work named in this text that are necessary to create a water supply system:
- obtaining licenses for subsoil exploration and mining;
- carrying out exploration works;
- drilling of the wells;
- creation of water intake units;
- development of water treatment systems;
- design of water supply and sewerage systems;
- service maintenance of commissioned facilities.
By contacting our company, you get a contractor competent in solving all engineering problems and performing all turnkey work.
Similar topics: Emergency services Emergency house Inspection certificate Landscaping Contributions for major repairs Water disposal Water supply Waste removal and disposal Waste disposal Construction waste removal Gasification Gas equipment Gas pipelines Gas supply hot water supply Gorgaz House management Housing inspection Zhilkomservis Zhilservis ZHKO ZHKZ ZhEK ZHEU Replacement of batteries Replacement of windows Replacement of radiators Replacement of risers Replacement of pipes Replacement of electric meters Blockage Flood Flooding Flooding of the premises Overhaul Utility payments Utilities Benefits for housing and communal services Power lines MKD Common property ODN ODS Payment for utility bills Payment for utility bills Payment for utilities Payment for electricity Water cutoff Gas cutout Light outage Electricity cutout Heating Recalculation of housing and communal services Recalculation for utilities Recalculation for heating Recalculation of meters Checking meters Connecting gas Connecting electricity Flood Metering devices Recognition houses emergency Radio point Repair Repair of the house Subsidies for payment of housing and communal services Tariffs of housing and communal services Heating network Heat supply Partnership Pavement House manager Management Company Housing and communal services Installation of cold water meters Electrification Power supply Energosbyt
- Is it possible to run water supply between plots in snt?
- Are snt obliged to provide irrigation water supply. Is there such a law?
- A house in SNT, a common summer water supply, in case of a leak, who should repair it?
- At what distance from the fence can you dig a trench for water supply in snt.
- How to get plumbing installed in SNT?
- How to refuse water supply in SNT?
- Membership fees in snt
- Land owned by snt
- Property documents in St.
- Electricity in SNT
- Documents for land in snt
Questions
1. Is it possible to conduct water supply between plots in snt?
1.1. For the installation of a water supply system, there are SNIPs, depending on the diameter, there are norms for indentation from the border of the site.
2. Are the snt obliged to provide irrigation water supply. Is there such a law?
2.1. Hello Pavel!
SNT provides its members with the set of services that is determined at the general meeting of SNT. If you have such a duty, then you must provide. In practice, there are SNTs that provide irrigation water and those that do not. For example, in my SNT it was forbidden to provide summer residents with irrigation water due to the nature of the nature protection zone in which our SNT is located and the pipes were dismantled. Now everyone has their own wells.
3. A house in SNT, a common summer water supply, in case of a leak, who should repair it?
3.1. According to the Federal Law of April 15, 1998 N 66-FZ "On horticultural, gardening and country non-profit associations of citizens"
The competence of the board of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association includes: organization of construction, repair and maintenance of buildings, structures, structures, engineering networks, roads and other public facilities.
Therefore, if no repair action is taken, you should apply in writing to SNT.
4. At what distance from the fence can you dig a trench for water supply in snt.
4.1. Hello.
According to SNIPAM, the distance is calculated. Is there a plan?
29. Member garden partnership has three sections. He does not want to pay membership fees for two sites, he wrote a statement to be removed from the partnership for these sites. He has his own road, he does not need running water. Ready to draw up a contract for the use of electricity. That is, to save on the expenses of the partnership for the maintenance of electricity networks, wages garden association boards, taxes, etc. Please help me legally resolve this issue. How to proceed SNT in such cases?
29.1. Dear Svetlana Borisrvna!
The conditions and procedure for paying contributions are established by the Charter of the garden partnership.
So, in cases provided for by the charter of the partnership, the amount of contributions may differ for individual members of the partnership, if this is due to the different volume of use of common property, depending on the size of the garden or garden land and (or) the total size of the area of objects real estate located on such a land plot, or the size of the share in the right of common shared ownership of such land plot and (or) real estate objects located on it.
30. Is it possible to run a water pipe from the central pipe to my SNT under a road owned by another SNT if there is not much to go?
30.1. If the owner of the water supply does not object to the connection, you have the specifications for connecting to this water supply and the project agreed with the owner of the network, the owners of the road do not have the right to interfere, they have easement imposed on the part of the site where the water supply passes.
But it is necessary with the owners of the land. of the site and the road surface to agree on the place and timing of the work, the amount of landscaping to be restored.
P.S. Do not forget to link the pipeline being laid with other existing networks. To comply with horizontal and vertical indents from other neighboring networks, see SNIP and TSN.
Case No. 2-391/ 2011
SOLUTION
IN THE NAME OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
Kirovsky District Court of Volgograd composed of: presiding judge Asatiani D.The. with the secretary Popova Y.S., as well as with the participation of the representative of the plaintiff Tyuryukina V.G., the defendant-chairman of the board of SNT “S.” Gaidukevich A.N., representative of the defendant Gaidukevich A.N. - Chernoy A.V., defendant - member of the board of SNT “S.” Gulyaeva G.M.,
examined in open court on March 1, 2011 in the city of Volgograd a civil case under the claim of Tyuryukin The.The. to the chairman of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Gaidukevich A.N., members of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Solomakhin F.V., Mochalov V.V., Gulyaev G.M. on compulsion to ensure proper water supply for the irrigation season to the garden plot, to recalculate membership dues recovering compensation for moral damages,
SET UP:
Plaintiff Tyuryukin The.The. filed a lawsuit against the chairman of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Gaidukevich A.N., members of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Solomakhin F.V., Mochalov V.A., Gulyaev G.M. on compulsion to ensure proper water supply for the irrigation season to the garden plot, to recalculate membership fees, to recover moral damages.
He motivates his demands by the fact that he is a member of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) “S.”, in his use is a garden plot No. A. In 2009-2010 due to a clogged pipeline, water was not supplied to his garden plot during the irrigation season. The defendants did not take any action to eliminate the blockage, in connection with which in 2010 trees and vegetables died on his site. Despite the fact that his plot was not irrigated, he paid the membership fees for 2009 in full, and in 2010 only 500 rubles for irrigation were excluded. In connection with the inaction of the defendants, the plaintiff suffered moral and physical suffering, he was hospitalized in the cardiology department. He asks to recognize the defendants guilty of not providing irrigation of the garden plot No. A in the summer seasons of 2009-2010, to oblige the chairman of the SNT "S." Gaidukevich A.N. ensure proper water supply to the garden plot No. A, recalculate membership fees for 2009-2010, excluding the cost of water supply, taking into account the consumed electricity, maintenance costs service personnel, for the operation of the road, and also to recover from the chairman of the SNT "S." Gaidukevich A.N. in his favor non-pecuniary damage in the amount of 25,000 rubles, the cost of paying the state fee in the amount of 200 rubles.
Plaintiff Tyuryukin The.The. did not appear at the hearing, duly notified. An application was made to consider the case in his absence.
At the hearing to submit the plaintiff Tyuryukina The.T. insisted on satisfying the claims, she explained to the court that for two years, due to a blockage in the pipeline, watering of the garden plot No. A, owned by the plaintiff, was not carried out. The defendants were notified of the pipeline malfunction, but they did not take any action, the plaintiff's appeals were not considered. In 2009 Tyuryukin V.V. paid membership fees in full, no recalculation was made, and in 2010 the cost of irrigation in the amount of 500 rubles was excluded from payment. Believes that total cost not provided services for irrigation and maintenance of the site for one season is 2312 rubles 44 kopecks.
The defendant is the chairman of the board of SNT "S." Gaidukevich A.N. at the hearing, she did not recognize the claims, she explained to the court that the water to the garden plot No. A was supplied properly, however, due to the fact that the pipes are located bypassing the neighboring plot, the water pressure is weak. Due to the fact that the replacement of pipes from the dispensing valves to the garden plot is carried out at the expense of gardeners, the plaintiff was offered to purchase pipes for laying a new line at his own expense, but he refused.
The representative of the defendant Gaydukevich A.GN- Chernaya A.The. at the hearing believed that the claims are not subject to satisfaction, since the water supply to the plaintiff's garden plot was carried out properly. In 2009 Tyuryukin V.V. he did not apply with statements about the absence of water on his site, section No. A was not disconnected from the pipeline, water is regularly supplied to the joint valves, and the plaintiff has a problem with irrigation on the pipeline section to be serviced by the gardener himself. In 2010, the plaintiff did not pay membership fees, so the claims for their recalculation are unfounded.
The defendant is a member of the board of SNT "S." Gulyaev G.M. at the hearing, he did not recognize the claims, he explained to the court that, at the request of the plaintiff, he went to site No. A, where it was established that the pipes from the valve to the garden plot needed to be replaced. In 2010, they replaced part of the pipe, the water supply was restored, but the pipes need to be completely replaced, and the plaintiff refuses to purchase them at his own expense.
The defendant is members of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Solomakhin F.V., Mochalov V.A. did not appear at the hearing, duly notified.
The court, after hearing the representative of the plaintiff Tyuryukin V.G., the defendant - chairman of the board of SNT "S." Gaidukevich A.N., representative of the defendant Gaidukevich A.N. - Chernaya A.V., defendant - member of the board of SNT “S.” Gulyaeva G.M., a witness, having examined the evidence available in the case file, believes to refuse to satisfy the claims on the following grounds:
In accordance with Article 1 of the Federal Law of April 15, 1998 N 66-FZ (as amended on December 30, 2008) "On horticultural, horticultural and dacha non-profit associations of citizens", a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association of citizens (horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit partnership, horticultural, horticultural or country consumer cooperative, horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit partnership) - non-profit organization, established by citizens on a voluntary basis to assist its members in solving common social and economic problems of gardening, horticulture and dacha farming (hereinafter referred to as a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association);
membership fee - cash, periodically contributed by members of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association for the remuneration of employees who have entered into employment contracts with such an association, and other operating expenses of such an association.
According to Article 16 of the Federal Law “On horticultural, horticultural and dacha non-profit associations of citizens” No. 66-FZ of April 15, 1998, a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association is created on the basis of a decision of citizens as a result of the establishment or as a result of the reorganization of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association.
The founding document of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association is the charter approved by the general meeting of the founders of the non-profit association.
By virtue of Article 18 of the Federal Law “On horticultural, horticultural and dacha non-profit associations of citizens” No. 66-FZ of April 15, 1998, members of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit partnership (horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit partnership) can be citizens Russian Federation who have reached the age of eighteen years and have land plots within the boundaries of such a partnership (partnership).
In accordance with Article 20 of the Federal Law “On horticultural, horticultural and dacha non-profit associations of citizens” No. 66-FZ of April 15, 1998, the governing bodies of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association are the general meeting of its members, the board of such an association, the chairman of its board .
According to Article 24 of the Federal Law “On horticultural, horticultural and dacha non-profit associations of citizens” No. 66-FZ of April 15, 1998, the chairman of the board of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association and members of its board, in exercising their rights and fulfilling established duties, must act in in the interests of such an association, to exercise their rights and fulfill the established duties in good faith and reasonably.
Article 46 of the Federal Law “On horticultural, gardening and dacha non-profit associations of citizens” No. 66-FZ of April 15, 1998 establishes that the rights of a horticultural, horticultural or dacha non-profit association to own, use and dispose of land plots for common use, other property of such associations, other stipulated by this Federal Law and other federal laws rights.
Protection of the rights of horticultural, horticultural, country non-profit associations and their members in accordance with criminal, administrative, civil and land legislation is carried out, inter alia, through the recognition of their rights; restoration of the situation that existed before the violation of their rights, and suppression of actions that violate their rights or create a threat of violation of their rights; compensation for their losses.
By virtue of clause 3.1 of the Charter of the horticultural non-profit partnership "S.", the subject of the activity of the Partnership is to meet the material and other needs of members as a result of growing fruit, berry, vegetable and other crops on land plots on their own and with their own means, organizing healthy recreation, as well as assistance to the members of the Partnership in solving the general social and economic tasks of the activities of the Partnership, assistance in organizing the life and recreation of members-gardeners and their families.
According to clause 3.2.3 of the Charter, in accordance with the subject of the Partnership's activities, the main goals and objectives are, among other things, the organization of providing utilities(electricity, water, waste disposal, etc.) of the members of the Partnership and the organization of payment for these services by the relevant services.
From clause 12.5.5 of the Charter of SNT "S." It follows that the Chairman and members of the Board of the Partnership, in exercising their rights and performing the established duties, must act in the interests of the Partnership, exercise their rights and perform the established duties conscientiously and reasonably.
At the court session it was established that on the basis of the decision of the board horticultural partnership SNT "S." dated 03/26/2008 Tyuryukin V.V. is its member, he owns the land plot No. A line 30 (case sheet 34).
By the decision of the General Meeting of authorized members of the horticultural non-profit partnership "S." dated 13.03.2010 the payment of membership fees for 1 sq.m. in the amount of 3.50 rubles, the payment deadline is set to 10/01/2010, and it was also decided that the repair and restoration of pipelines from the valve to the garden plot should be carried out at the expense of gardeners using water from these valves (case sheet 67).
On 05/07/2010, 06/15/2010, 07/02/2010, 08/20/2010, the plaintiff applied to the board of SNT "S." with statements about the lack of water during irrigation in his garden plot (case files 11-14). On 07.07.2010, a representative of the administration of the Kirovsky district of Volgograd inspected garden plot No. A and found that at the time scheduled for irrigation, no water was supplied to the plot (case sheet 16).
07/03/2010 at a meeting of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership "S." was considered statement Tyuryukinoy The.The. about the poor water pressure at site No. A, it was found that the gardener refuses the options for solving the problem proposed by the partnership, asks to clean her pipes for water to enter, but this will not solve the problem. Twice the workers visited the site, the problem is not in cleaning the pipes, but in their location - they are located bypassing the neighboring site, which makes it difficult for water pressure. Tyuryukina was offered to purchase pipes at her own expense and build a new line by the partnership, she refused. The board decided to offer the gardener to purchase at his own expense the number of pipes necessary for laying a new line and provide workers for their installation (case sheet 68).
In support of his arguments, the plaintiff refers to the fact that water is not supplied to his garden plot through the fault of the chairman of SNT “S.”, members of the board of SNT “S.” since 2009, in connection with which it is necessary to recalculate membership fees from the specified period. However, the court considers that the statements of the plaintiff, his representative that water has not been supplied to garden plot No. A since 2009, have not been confirmed during the consideration of the case, since no objective data have been confirmed.
The witness FULL NAME, interrogated at the hearing, explained that in 2009 the plaintiff received only an application to eliminate a pipe break in the garden plot No. A. He, together with Gulyaev G.M. went to the site, where it was found that the pipes from the valve to the garden area were faulty, they changed part of the pipe, cleaned them, and watering was restored. Tyuryukin V.V. it was proposed to change all the pipes at his own expense, but he refused.
In accordance with Article 56 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, each party must prove the circumstances to which it refers as the basis for its claims and objections, unless otherwise provided by federal law.
The plaintiff did not provide evidence showing that in 2009 he applied to the chairman of the board of SNT “S.” on the issue of the lack of watering of his garden plot, in this regard, there was no obligation for the defendants to make decisions on this issue, as well as to recalculate membership fees for 2009.
The arguments of the plaintiff Tyuryukin V.V., his representative that the defendants should bear the obligation to eliminate the pipeline malfunction, the court also considers unfounded, since the repair and restoration of pipelines from the valve to the garden plot in accordance with the decision of the General Meeting of authorized members of the horticultural non-profit partnership “S. » dated 03/13/2010, the gardeners themselves, using water from these valves, must bear it.
The court cannot take into account the message submitted by the plaintiff of the Volgograd Regional Union of horticultural, horticultural non-profit associations that the refusal of the chairman of the board Gaydukevich A.N. from work on the water line by the repair service of SNT "S." are illegal, since the representative of this association did not inspect the plaintiff's garden plot, and did not establish the reason for stopping the water supply.
In addition, from a single book gardener it follows that the plaintiff paid membership dues only for 2009, payment of membership dues for 2010 Tyuryukin V.The. not made, so his claims to recalculate the payment of contributions for 2010 are unfounded.
The court, during the consideration of the case, explained to the plaintiff the possibility of changing the claims in accordance with the requirements of Article 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, however, the plaintiff did not use this right.
Thus it is the court considers that the requirements Tyuryukina The.The. on the compulsion of the chairman of the SNT "S." ensure proper water supply for the irrigation season to the garden plot, recalculate membership fees for 2009-2010. are unreasonable and not subject to satisfaction.
In accordance with Article 151 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, if a citizen has suffered moral harm (physical or moral suffering) by actions that violate his personal non-property rights or encroach on other non-material benefits belonging to the citizen, as well as in other cases provided for by law, the court may impose on the violator obligation to pay compensation for the said damage.
Given that the plaintiff did not confirm the fact that the defendants caused moral and physical suffering, under what circumstances and by what actions they were inflicted, the court believes that the claims for compensation for moral damage are also not subject to satisfaction.
According to Article 98 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court awards the party in whose favor the court decision was made to reimburse all court expenses incurred in the case on the other side, except for the cases provided for by part two of Article 96 of this Code.
Due to the fact that in the suit Tyuryukinu The.The. denied, court costs are also non-refundable.
Based on the foregoing, guided by Articles 194-199 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the court
I DECIDED:
In satisfaction of claims Tyuryukina The.The. to the chairman of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Gaidukevich A.N., members of the board of the horticultural non-profit partnership (SNT) "S." Solomakhin F.V., Mochalov V.V., Gulyaev G.M. on compulsion to ensure proper water supply for the irrigation season to the garden plot, to recalculate membership fees, to recover compensation for moral damage - to refuse.
The decision may also be appealed by the parties within 10 days to the Volgograd regional court through the Kirovsky District Court of Volgograd.
Judge - D.V. Asatiani
For beginners: breeding a broiler at home Boiled water for broilers
Only lovers will survive
Features of advertising aimed at children
retouching old photos in photoshop retouching old photos
What is an NPO: decoding, definition of goals, types of activities Does a non-profit organization have the right